
Op-Ed
Commentary
Scott
Sullivan:
Bush joins Iran and Venezuela in new axis
Iran and Venezuela constitute what is called the
"Brown Shirt" or SA
coalition in global politics today. These leaders of these two
countriesare
called Brown Shirts because of their outsized territorial ambitions,
their
readiness to overturn the regional status quo through terrorism,
and the
open contempt with which they regard the US and western democracies
in
general.
In a huge surprise, President Bush and the US
are now joining the Brown
Shirt coalition. The US is doing so by aligning itself with Iran's
policy
in the Middle East, especially Iraq, and with Venezuela's policy
in Latin
America, especially Bolivia.
In the Middle East, President Bush is preparing
for a comprehensive US-Iran
strategic partnership. Such a policy would begin with a joint
US-Iran
occupation of Iraq. To this end, Iran and the US are now coordinating
policy on the Maliiki government, down to the specifics of allocating
cabinet seats within the Maliki government, according to today's
story in
the BBC.
Along this US-Iran continuum of strategic partnership
will emerge joint
US-Iranian peacekeeping in Iraq. Thus, the US and Iran will be
involved in
Iraq's civil war on one side, helping one faction of the Shia
(Hakim and
SCIRI) that is pro-Iran. On the other side of Iraq's civil war,
and opposed
by Iran and the US, will be the anti-Iran faction of Iraq's Shia
(Muqtada
al-Sadr), the Sunnis, and the Kurds. President Bush will have
to explain
how he can be sure he ha picked the wining side in Iraq's civil
war.
Just as the US is pro-Iran in the Middle East,
the US is becoming pro-Chavez
in Latin America. For example, the US has yet to put down red
lines against
Chavez's annexation of Bolivia. This week's press, for example,
caries
stories of the arrival of Venezuelan troops in Bolivia, without
a word of
protest from the US.
The arrival of Chavez's troops in Bolivia follows
recent large
demonstrations for independence from La Paz in eastern Bolivia.
Chavez
clearly intends to put down future demonstrations by force, and
will have
the full support of the US in doing so. It seems the US military
in Bolivia
is playing a crucial role in assisting the transition from an
era of US
dominance of the military to Venezuelan and Cuban dominance of
the military.
US Sate Department officials are delighted in
US gains in strategic
partnership with Iran in Iraq, and with Hugo Chavez in Bolivia.
However, US
policy now faces three insurmountable obstacles.
First, US partnership with Iran in Iraq is in
reality a US partnership with
Hezbollah and Hamas. President Bush and other US officials would
thus come
to be seen as terrorists, which eliminates the US moral edge in
the war on
terrorism.
Second, a US partnership with Chavez in Bolivia
is the same thing as a US
partnership with Lopez Obrador in Mexico, and with Ortega in Nicaragua.
If
it is not the same thing, perhaps President Bush would like to
explain the
differences.
A perception that the US is shifting in favor
of Obrador could boost his
campaign to bring down Mexico's government. Would President Bush
then call
Obrador's victory a US success? In this context, US voters, especially
in
Texas, would be keenly interested in how US policy helped bring
anarchy to
Mexico. Again, perhaps President Bush can explain.
Third, just because the US is surrendering to
Iran in Iraq and Hugo Chavez
in Bolivia does not mean the fighting is over. Indeed, local,
patriotic
resistance forces will hit back in Iraq and Bolivia. The resistance
in Iraq
and Bolivia could prevail, despite US support for the government
in both
instances, yet another setback for President Bush to explain.
In
short, President Bush is climbing aboard the Brown Shirt/SA bandwagon
by
joining Iran in Iraq and Hugo Chavez in Bolivia. As a result,
Bush is now a
partner with Hezbollah, Evo Morales, and Fidel Castro. Again,
can President
Bush please explain how this is supposed to work, and provide
one good
reason to Republicans as to why he should be kept in office?
Scott
Sullivan
is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld does
not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do
not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the
comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed
are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of
this website. All comments are posted and published without liability
to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of
which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian
significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works
published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article
nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast
Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify
the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and
it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107
of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use',
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet web
links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld
News 01/08/07
Copyright©
2006 Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels