Editorial
Commentary
Scott
Sullivan :
Richardson
plan brings Iran’s demise
Summary: In short, only one viable option exists for Senator Clinton and
the other presidential candidates – endorse Bill Richardson’s
plan for the immediate withdrawal of all US military personnel in Iraq.
Bring the troops home, and mobilize the Arabs, now!
Richardson Plan Brings
Iran’s Demise
The US has three options
for dealing with Iran in Iraq – collaboration;
confrontation; or mobilization of the Arab states via the early withdrawal
of all US troops, as suggested by Bill Richardson.
Under President Bush,
US policy continues to focus on US-Iran collaboration in Iraq. For more
detail on the extent of US-Iranian collaboration in Iraq,
thanks to US policy, see the op-ed by Ambassador Peter Galbraith, “Mission
Accomplished, for Iran,” Salon, 11 October 07.
Unfortunately for President Bush, his policy of US-Iran collaboration
in Iraq is unworkable.
First, Iran and its
Nazi leadership are not interested in sharing power with the US in Iraq.
Iran’s Nazi president Ahmadinejad wants a world
in which the USA “no longer exists.” These are not the words
of a US partner. Second, the US public rejects the idea of Iran as a partner
because Iran is deeply involved in terrorism in the Middle East and South
America. Third, the UK and France oppose a policy of US-Iran collaboration
in Iraq. France in particular is threatened by the expansion of Iranian
influence in Lebanon. A stronger Iranian position in Iraq would boost the
Iranian position in Syria and Lebanon.
In August 2007, President
Bush switched from a policy of collaboration with Iran to a policy of
carefully circumscribed US-Iran confrontation
in Iraq. Bush threatened to designate Iran’s revolutionary Guards
(IRGC) as a terrorist organization. The US also arrested several IRGC members
active in Iraq in terms of weapons smuggling.
The problem for President
Bush is that the Iraqi Kurds now support Iran, not the US. Just this
week Iraqi president Talabani (who is a Kurd) said
that he now favored breaking Iraq into three regions, as promoted by Iran.
Talabani also permitted Kurdish authorities to sign new oil agreements
bypassing Baghdad’s central government, following the Kurdish-Hunt
Oil agreement signed two weeks ago. Finally, Talabani said Kurdish authorities
would resist US efforts to apprehend IRGC agents in Iraq.
In other words, US confrontation with Iran is blocked by Talabani. As
noted earlier, a policy of US-Iran collaboration is at a dead end, despite
strong support from President Bush. What will work?
The only remaining
US option is a policy of immediate withdrawal of all US troops from Iraq,
as suggested under Bill Richardson’s plan. Under
Richardson’s scenario the US would essentially turn Iraq and its
problems over to the UN and the Arab League.
Good! This is an excellent US move because it would demoralize Iran, who
detests the UN, while maximizing Arab support for a UN/Arab peacekeeping
force. Richardson would not only deter Iran in Iraq, he would deter Iran
in the Persian Gulf because his peacekeeping force would be based in Bahrain
and the UAE. Perfect!
With this single proposal
Bill Richardson has earned a place on Mount Rushmore. Clinton and Giuliani,
who are alike in accepting Bush’s
pro-Iran stance in Iraq, should join Bill Richardson.
In short, only one
viable option exists for Senator Clinton and the other presidential candidates – endorse Bill Richardson’s
plan for the immediate withdrawal of all US military personnel in Iraq.
Bring the
troops home, and mobilize the Arabs, now!
Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld
not necessarily share these views.
Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and
do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 10/11/07
Copyright© 2007
Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels