Editorial
Commentary
Scott
Sullivan :
Richardson plan
will crush PKK and IRGC
The US has only three options for Iraq: -- continue to support the existing
Nazi PKK/IRGC government in Iraq; join the Arab struggle to liberate
Iraq by using US forces; and, finally, withdraw all US forces immediately
from Iraq while supporting the Arab/Turkish liberation struggle in
Iraq via diplomacy and arms sales.
Under US occupation, Iraq has became a safe haven for PKK and Iranian
Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) terrorism. The PKK terrorism is directed at
Turkey, while the IRGC terrorism is directed at Iraqi Sunnis as well as
followers of anti-Iranian Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr.
The US official policy is to oppose PKK and IRGC terrorism. In reality,
the USG protects the PKK and IRGC. Forr example, the US ignores the PKK
military buildup in northern Iraq, and has made only pro forma objections
to PKK cross border military raids into Turkey.
In fact, the US is now warning Turkey not to chase PKK terrorists across
the border into Iraq. In effect, the US is now at war with Turkey on behalf
of the PKK.
The US also protects Iranian Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) terrorism in
Iraq. The US does this by renaming the IRGC as the Badr Brigade, which
is a pro-Iranian Shiite militia in Iraq. By means of this fiction of renaming
the IRGC the US is able to collaborate with the IRGC in restructuring Iraqi
forces, and to provide the IRGC with weapons and training.
The US also protects the IRGC by attacking Muqtada al-Sadr, who is anti-Iran.
The US, at Iranian behest, hopes to destroy Sadr in southern Iraq so that
Iran can take the strategic port city of Basra. Once Iran controls Basra,
ran will be positioned to control Baghdad. Sad is very strong in Basra
and is opposed to an Iranian takeover of Basra.
Finally, President Bush protects the iRGC by refusing to designate the
IRGC and the Badr Brigade as terrorist organizations; refusing to push
out the 30,000 IRGC personnel in Iraq who work for Iran; and refusing to
ask Kurdish president Masoud Barzani not to work with the IRGC to partition
Iraq.
In short, the US is in full support of the Nazi government in Iraq composed
of the PKK and the IRGC.
As noted earlier, the US faces three options in Iraq -- continue collaboration
withthe PKK/IRGC pro-Iran, pro-Nazi government; use US forces to cooperate
with Arab forces to overthrow the IRGC/PKK government; or withdraw all
US forces from Iraq and support the Arab liberation struggle in Iraq with
diplomacy and arms, otherwise known as the Richardson Plan.
The superior option, by far, is option three, US support for the Richardson
Plan.
The killer drawback for option one -- continued US backing for the PKK/IRGC
government -- is that this Nazi government has virtually no support in
Iraq. In fact, once Kurdish support is set aside, the PKK/IRGC government
is isolated amongst the Iraqi people. Moreover, the PKK/IRGC government
is trying to destabilize the Middle East. The US does not want to be associated
with such an effort.
The killer drawback for option two -- using US forces in Iraq to cooperate
with Arab/Turkish forces to overthrow the PKK/IRGC government -- is that
the entire US high command in Iraq is pro-PKK and pro-IRGC, as is the entire
Bush administration. To be blunt, these personnel may be unwilling to put
down the PKK and the IRGC. In this regard, the US would act as an unwelcome
restraint on the Arab/Turkish forces and could undermine the liberation
struggle in Iraq.
Option three -- the withdrawal of all US forces from Iraq, and US support
for Turkey and the Arabs via diplomacy and arms -- provides the only guarantee
of success in suppressing the PKK and IRGC. In other words, to quote Lenin,
who knew a fair amount about military tactics, the US must nown take one
step back (withdraw from Iraq) in order to take two steps forward (subdue
Iran and reemerge as a global superpower).
Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld
not necessarily share these views. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
note All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments
and
do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments
are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 10/17/07
Copyright© 2007
Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels