Editorial
Commentary
Veneconomy:
Not reflected anywhere, not even in China!
In 2006, China received $662 billion in foreign direct investment, equivalent
to $510 per inhabitant and an increase of 54% compared to 2005.
It can be deduced from these figures that the communist Government of China
considers foreign investment to be important for the development of the
nation and the progress of its inhabitants.
However, its new ally, the communist government of Chávez, does
not seem to share this point of view. In recent years, its persistent anti-investment
policy, the lack of legal certainty, and the proliferation of “socialist” laws
and decrees that snarl up the economy have generated a substantial decline
in foreign direct investment in Venezuela. According to the latest report
from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, today Venezuela
is at the back of the queue in the region when it comes to foreign direct
investment.
Between 2002 and 2005, according to SIEX (Foreign Investment Superintendency),
foreign direct investment in Venezuela was merely $500 million a year,
equivalent to only $16.6 per capita. And in the first nine months of 2006,
foreign direct investment came to a measly $76 million, equivalent to $3
per Venezuelan per year.
In 2007, the outlook is even worse. Before, there were grounds for thinking
that at least the companies already established in the country would remain.
However, the indicators show that this is not the case. Now the problem
is one of underinvestment: on the one hand fresh capital is not coming
into Venezuela, and on the other, domestic and foreign capital is stampeding
out.
Many companies are leaving Venezuela of their own according in search of
better opportunities or to safeguard their capital from the advancing communism
represented by the radical changes to the 1999 Constitution proposed by
the President. Some of the new destinations of this capital are Colombia,
Brazil, and Costa Rica.
Other companies (particularly from countries Chávez labels imperialist
or that do not kowtow to him) have been shown the door by the government,
either by passing them over to state ownership or by unilaterally and arbitrarily
changing the terms of the contracts under which they were operating their
businesses, among them AES, previously the majority shareholder of La Electricidad
de Caracas, Verison (former shareholder of Cantv), and the oil companies
ENI, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips.
On top of that, there is the flight of capital from the small and medium-size
enterprises that daily close their doors as a result of punitive legal
and tax harassment meted out by the dictatorial Chávez administration.
One of this government’s biggest mistakes is its insistence on implementing
an economic model that has failed wherever it has been attempted. The best
example is China, a country that was plunged in the direst poverty in the
times of Mao Tse Tung and that today is the world’s third largest
economy.It is worth noting that China’s new constitution guarantees
private property. He who has eyes to see, let him see.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic and
financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day,
as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not
necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 10/18/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do
not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the
comment as an
endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private
comments and
do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All
comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 10/22/07
Copyright© 2007
VenEconomy. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels