World
Institutional
links
Welcome back on
26 -29 August,
ONS 2008
Bridging
the energy gap
is ONS 2006 theme,
from 22-25 August,
in Stavanger, Norway
Petroleumworld
Business
Partners:
Centre for
Global Energy
Studies
  |
|
Editorial Commentary
Scott Sullivan:
Bush chooses PKK over Turkey
Two questions are important in Iraq? Who are the good guys in Iraq? How do we know without ambiguity that the good guys are winning in Iraq?These are easy questions. The good guys are those who want to defeat the PKK; protect Iraq as an independent state; and strengthen Iraq as a deterrent to Iran. The good guys are Turkey, Syria and the Arab states, i.e., the Iraqi Unionists.
The bad guys, in contrast, want to break up Iraq into three separate states, Kurdish, Shiite, and Sunni. The bad guys are the PKK, Kurdish president Barzani, and Iran, i.e., the Iraqi confederates.
In his meeting with Turlish president Erdogan yesterday, President Bush failed to lay out a US-Turkish Road Map to prevent Iraqi partition by the PKK, as requested by Erdogan. Bush’s failure suggests he is staying true to the pro-PKK policy that has guided his administration from the beginning. In other words, given yesterday’s Bush-Erdogan meeting, President Bush is still backing the bad guys.
How will we know when the good guys/Unionists in Iraq are winning?
This question is also easy. We will know the good guys are winning in Iraq when it is clear that Kirkuk and its oil will remain Iraqi, not transferred to Barzani and the PKK. Likewise, the good guys are winning in Iraq if Basra and its oil remain Iraqi and are not transferred to Iran.
Iraqi loss of Kirkuk and Basra would terminate Iraqi statehood because 90 per cent of Iraq’s national income would be diverted to Kurds and Iranians.
Moreover, if Iraq first loses Kirkuk to Kurds, Iraq would soon lose Basra to Iran. To put it another way, a partial division of Iraq is not sustainable because a loss of either Kirkuk or Basra would cripple the Baghdad government. Iraq will either protect both Kirkuk and Basra, or Iraq will lose both.
Baghdad’s loss of Kirkuk and Basra would sink US military policy for Iraq. Iraqi Sunnis in Anbar Province would plunge again into full scale rebellion (the Iraqi Sunnis would have no oil; virtually all of Iraqi proven oil reserves are in Kirkuk and Basra). Al-Qaeda would return in force to Anbar Province. Meanwhile, the Kurds would annex Kirkuk and Northern Iraq. Iran would annex Basra and Southern Iraq. President Bush’s Operation Surge would stall, for good.
In short, by spurning Turkish PM Erdogan’s appeal for a road map to defeat the PKK in Iraq, Bush took a giant and perhaps decisive step towards defeating Operation Surge in Iraq. Has anyone briefed Bush yet on this bad news?
Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 11/06/07
Copyright© 2007 Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Send this story to a friend
Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.Write to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.comBest Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels