Editorial
Commentary
Oliver
L Campbell:
Will
PDVSA make further divestments?
When the Oil Minister makes declarations to the press about
investments abroad, as he has just done, it is necessary to read between
the lines.
Like a clue in a cryptic crossword, you have to use your lateral thinking
to come up with an answer. I don’t know if I have interpreted his
various statements correctly, but I will share my thoughts with the reader.
Firstly, it is not clear if the minister considers investments
abroad are a good thing or a bad thing. Influenced by Juan Carlos Boué’s
book, “The internationalisation of PDVSA--a costly illusion” and
by the latter’s mentor, Bernard Mommer, the minister has declared
in the past that the purchase of refineries abroad was a huge mistake.
However, latterly, the refineries of CITGO and Ruhr Oil have been making
money hand over fist and his most recent statement (published in Petroleumworld
on 16 November) affirms, “We shall continue to hold assets abroad,
but will continue with our analysis and, if we consider any one is not
strategic, we will sell it or transfer it. We want to be able to justify
all our business.”
This would indicate the minister now thinks the investments
abroad are a good thing unless they are not strategic. Since you can
have assets abroad
which, though not strategic, still make a lot of money, this is quite a
bold statement. He further goes on to say, “Though the cash flows
abroad are large and constant, close to 90 percent is used for acquiring
crudes for processing in the refineries.”
The minister has never liked the fact the refineries process
oil purchased from third parties and not Venezuela. This occurs with
CITGO since PDVSA
can only supply half the company’s crude requirements. It also happens
with Ruhr Oil where crudes shipped from Venezuelan account for less than
10 percent of PDVSA’S input and the latter buys the balance, in light
crudes, from third parties. Not only does this save freight but the light
crude gives a better yield.
So what assets abroad are candidates for disposal? The following is just
conjecture on my part, but I try to give some reasons.
1) Lemont refinery. This refinery in Illinois receives no crude from Venezuela,
and most of its intake is bought from the Canadians across the border.
The refinery yields some 75 percent of gasoline and diesel and certainly
makes money. However, it has no particular strategic importance to Venezuela.
2) Ruhr Oil refineries. These process only small quantities
of heavy crudes since the refineries were designed for lighter crudes
which give a better
yield of gasoline and diesel for the German domestic market. However, PDVSA
has spent money on the Gelsenkirchen refinery in order to process a limited
amount of Venezuela’s heavy crudes. PDVSA’S partner, BP, does
not want to spend money modifying the refineries to process heavy crudes
since it can provide its share in light crudes.
Germany is Europe’s largest market and the refineries make a lot
of money. However, they are not strategic to PDVSA since the latter can
sell its available heavy crudes, i.e. those not committed elsewhere, for
processing in CITGO’S Lake Charles and Corpus Christi refineries
which have a capacity of some 470,000 b/d. The obvious purchaser would
be BP which owns the other half of Ruhr Oil.
I exclude the Nynas Petroleum refineries from the list--two
in Sweden and two small ones in the UK-- since they provide an outlet
for the heavy
Boscan crude. The asphalt is sold for road paving throughout Europe. The
refineries also produce naphthenic lubricants which are sold world-wide,
and Nynas has a niche in this lucrative market. PDVSA and Nynas were talking
of forming a joint venture in China, but I don’t know how this is
progressing. If PDVSA decided to sell, the obvious buyer would be its Finnish
partner, Fortum.Oil.
In concluding his declarations, the minister could help
mentioning that old chestnut that “the business in the USA was created at a tremendous
fiscal sacrifice.” Once again, he takes what Juan Carlos Boué wrote
as gospel, when it was only true in the early years. Because of the formula
used to calculate the price of the crude oil PDVSA sold to CITGO, the price
turned out to be lower than the spot market value. However, Boué forgot
to take into account that this was a transfer between one Group company
and another, and the result was that though PDVSA made less profit than
it should, CITGO made more profit than it should. The only loss to the
Group was relatively small--the 35 percent tax CITGO paid on that additional
profit in the USA.
Since oil prices shot up over three years ago, and again
because of the formula adopted, PDVSA has been selling crude to CITGO
at more than $5
a barrel above spot market prices. The extra profit made by PDVSA all accrues
to the State since Venezuelan income tax is part of government take. Furthermore,
the Group has benefited from the tax relief CITGO has obtained in the USA
on the higher crude cost. At some time, I trust the minister will acknowledge
the CITGO deal, rather than giving rise to a “tremendous sacrifice” has
been a “tremendous success.”
As an accountant, I am interested in the bottom line rather
than in theoretical postulations and, if assets are making superior
returns,
I am not worried
if they are strategic or not, or if the oil is bought from Venezuela or
not. However, there is a world-wide shortage of refinery capacity and refinery
values have increased enormously. I suspect the minister may be thinking
now is the right time to “cut and run.”
Oliver
L Campbell, MBA, DipM, FCCA, ACMA, MCIM was born in El Callao in
1931 where his father worked in the gold mining industry. He spent the
WWII years in
England, returning to Venezuela in 1953 to work with Shell de Venezuela
(CSV), later as Finance Coordinator at Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA).
In 1982 he returned to the UK with his family and retired early in 2002.
Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 11/20/07
Copyright© 2007
Oliver Campbell. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels