Editorial
Commentary
Veneconomy:
What
part of “No” did Chávez
not understand?
On December 2, 2007, Venezuela said “No” to the new constitution
proposed by Hugo Chávez. The president, however, seems not to
have understood that No means NO!, with no room for his usual little
catchphrase of “for the time being.”
Ever since the early hours of December 3, when he “acknowledged” (most
reluctantly and not at all chivalrously) that his “amendment” had
been defeated in the referendum, Hugo Chávez has done nothing
but attack the will of the people, democratically expressed in the ballot
box.
Not only did the president insult the majority in the opposition when,
during a press conference and in front of his Joint Chiefs of Staff,
he used an unmentionable term to describe the opposition’s victory:
Later on in another public address he attacked his followers, berating
them for not having supported him in the referendum. Chávez let
them know that those areas where the Yes option had not prevailed owed
him something, Caracas andMiranda especially. He then asked “are
you or aren’t you going to pay?”
Far from diminishing as the days go by, the threats are becoming more
widespread. First of all, the threats against his followers are now being
broadcast in short spots on state-owned TV channels.
In addition another witch-hunt has begun. Among other examples of abuse,
Captain Carlos Guyón, arrested just hours before the referendum,
has been added to the long list of political prisoners. Unwarranted court
cases have been reopened – all having to do with the events in
April 2002 – against former judge Mónica Fernández,
founding member of Foro Penal Venezolano; the mayor of Baruta, Henrique
Capriles Radonsky; the former governor of Miranda, Enrique Mendoza; and
the journalist Milagros Durán.
Then there are the physical attacks on people from sectors that oppose
the president. First of all, the case of Larry José Arvelo, the
Globovisión cameraman who was arrested, while covering the assault
by a group of Chavista motorcyclists on a traffic-police post, and then
severely beaten while being hauled away in the back of a Policía
Metropolitana truck. Next Cardinal Jorge Urosa, was set upon by a group
of pro-government thugs who spend their time on the esquina caliente
(or ”hot corner”) and are allegedly paid by Miraflores to
make sure that downtown Caracas is “territory conquered by the
Bolivarian revolution.” Lastly, there is the damage that pro-government
students and groups caused at Lisandro Alvarado University in Barquisimeto.
As though this were not enough, the newspapers this Tuesday include two
items offering a preview of what is in store with the new Bolivarian
march forward. One, that, after 30 years, the Correo del Caroní will
no longer be coming outdue to lack of newsprint, caused by the government’s
refusal to approve the dollars needed to import paper. The other is the
new set of regulations aimed at controlling text messages on mobile telephones,
a very effective means of communication used by the Movimiento de Estudiantes
organization, greatly feared by the government.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the
day, as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does
not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 12/11/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 12/14/07
Copyright© 2007
VenEconomy.
All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels