Editorial
Commentary
Gustavo
Coronel/Pedro Burelli:
CSIS
on Venezuelan social issues
Three
Venezuelan university professors speak at CSIS on Venezuelan social issues
In
the center for Strategic and International Studies, CSIS, in Washington
DC, three Venezuelan university professors gave the audience an authoritative
description of the Venezuelan social situation under Hugo Chavez. The
professors: Francisco Rodriguez, a Harvard PhD in Economics and professor
at Wesleyan University; Luis F. España, the director of the Institute
for Economic and Social research at the Venezuelan Catholic University
Andres Bello, in Caracas; and, Roberto Briceño-Leon, a PhD in
Sociology and Director of the Laboratory for Social Sciences, LACSO,
headquartered in Caracas. The professors dealt with the issues of poverty,
education, health and crime during the nine years of the Hugo Chavez
government.
THE PRESENTATIONS.
Francisco Rodriguez.
Rodriguez said that Hugo Chavez has followed a policy of sharing the oil wealth.
This has been his aim, especially in the health and educational areas. Due
to the significant oil income poverty has been reduced although the process
has been inefficient. As income per capita has increased about 16% under Chavez,
inequality has increased as shown by the Gini coefficients. There are high
scarcity levels in the country. He mentioned sardines (86%), black beans (85%)
and milk (65%) as examples of basic foods that cannot be easily obtained. I
immediately thought that this situation was tied to the great corruption prevailing
in Chavez’s government.
Food distribution is in the hands of “private” companies such as
ProArepa, reported to be the property of government bureaucrats who contract “with
themselves”.
Talking about the “Misiones”, the social programs instituted in
Venezuela in 2003 and 2004, at the suggestion of Fidel Castro, Rodríguez
said that unreliable statistics, made it difficult to find out how effective
they were. He said the government claimed to have eliminated illiteracy but
this was not true. In fact, I add, the United Nations rejected this claim by
the Chavez government. Rodriguez says that he found no credible evidence that
this program, the so-called Mision Robinson, really works. Talking about the
health situation Rodriguez said that the Venezuelan mortality rate had declined.
However, he added, this was the continuation of a trend that had started in
the 1940’s. He could not find any indication that this trend had accelerated
during the last nine years. On the other hand, he added, the hospitals in Venezuela
often lacked the most essential supplies while the Mision Barrio Adentro, staffed
with some 16,000 Cubans, offered primary medical attention but little else
in the poor urban sections of the country. Rodriguez mentioned the apparent
increase in political participation, as shown by significant increases in voter’s
enrollment. I think that a good portion of this increase is fraudulent. In
the last 3 years some 3 million voters have been added to the Electoral Registry.
This is an almost impossible growth that should be carefully audited. Thousands
of voters registered lack addresses and proper identification while thousand
others appear under the same name and date of birth but with different identity
document, in fact allowing one person to vote multiple times.
Since the organization seems unwilling to clean itself these irregularities
have been reported to international organizations, so far with no results.
Rodriguez mentioned cases of political retaliation against citizens who oppose
the government, the so-called Maisanta and Tascon lists, where Venezuelans
who voted against Chavez are being subject to exclusion from government jobs
and, I may add, from normal access to government services. Rodriguez mentioned
the specific case of a newspaper that has been denied the printing paper (in
fact, not one but two have been the object of retaliation).
Rodriguez mentioned that social spending has been great but if one deducts
social security spending, the amounts of social spending under this government
are actually declining. There is great inefficiency in this spending.
Luis
P. España.
España started by saying that Venezuela has grown economically during
the last nine years. He said that people now have more income, so that income
based poverty has been reduced from 64% in 1998 to about 45% in 2006. This,
he said, is the same trend that exists in most of Latin America and warned
that, while in other countries improvement had been the product of a diversified
economic activity economic activity, in Venezuela it was due to greater public
expenditure. He said that, although there is more income per capita, structural
conditions remain the same: low school attendance, a stagnant health system,
increasing subsidies, and the highest unemployment in Latin America. There
are, he said, more public employees than ever, and real unemployment is masked
by the fact that Venezuelans enrolled in educational programs are counted as
employed. More than 56% of all citizens able to work are in the informal sector,
about six million Venezuelans.
After five years, he said, the Misiones are weakening both in penetration and
efficiency. Although a majority of Venezuelans know about them just a minor
proportion receive their benefits. Probably the one with the most reach, Mercal
(subsidized or free food distribution), has been deteriorating. The impact
of the Misiones cannot be properly evaluated because of the short time involved
but they constitute social services, not structural programs. They help to
solve the citizen’s daily problem but not the deep-seated, structural
problems. I might add that, in fact, they worsen the deep-seated problems,
as they tend to make citizens more dependent in the paternalistic state. The
Misiones, España says, lack transparency and are very centralized and
politicized.
In spite of the higher income per capita España finds no evidence of
an improved income distribution. This in line with Rodriguez’s assertion
that inequality has increased. España expressed his opinion that, any
government that had received the same income this one has received, would have
probably performed a lot better.
Roberto
Briceño-Leon.
In 1980 Venezuela had a murder rate of about 9 per 100,000 people. This increased
to 20-30 per 100,000 people in the 1990’s but today is over 50 per 100,000
people.
It doubled in the last ten years. Other countries with similar murder rates
in the past such as Mexico and Brazil do not show this sudden growth. Briceño-Leon
says that the Venezuelan rates have two explanations. The first half, he says,
has a social explanation: inequality, poverty, idleness, machismo, drug trading,
alcohol, and marginal urban conditions. But the other half says Briceño-Leon
is political, responds to a fracture in the capacity of society to coexist
peacefully. This is due, I say, to the sowing of hate, racial tension and class
resentment by Hugo Chavez.
Systematically he has preached that the rich and the white are to blame for
poverty in the country. He says that “we are in a war”, that “stealing
is OK”, he speaks in military terms calling his revolution “armed”,
he delivers AK-47 guns to civilians, he thunders against the “oligarchs”.
There is little doubt that the increase in murder rates in the country has
mucho to do with this aggressive attitude of the president. In addition the
police is inefficient and lax and Chavez has ordered them not to repress, even
if this means letting citizens be murdered on the streets with impunity.
Briceño-Leon says that violence has been glorified by the regime. He
mentions the example of a Maracaibo hospital bearing the name of a Virgin being
renamed as Che Guevara, until a popular protest made him to withdraw the proposal.
An
officer from the Venezuelan Embassy tried to argue against the data presented
by Francisco Rodriguez, saying that the Venezuelan debt had been fully
paid.
Rodriguez answered that this was not true and that the external debt had increased
by $10 billion since Chavez arrived in power. In fact, total national debt
has tripled since Chavez became president.
Due
to the quality of the presenters and of the data they brought with them
this program on Venezuela is the best I have attended in 2007 on Venezuelan
issues. I sincerely congratulate the three professors and CSIS for giving
us so much good information on the myths and realities of Chavez’s
social programs and policies.
Gustavo Coronel is a 28 years oil industry veteran, a member of the
first board of directors (1975-1979) of Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA),
author of several books. At the present Coronel is Petroleumworld associate
editor and advisor on the opinion and editorial content of the site. Pedro
M. Burelli is a former Executive Board Member of PDVSA.Prior
to that, he was Head of JPMorgan Capital Corporation – Latin
America . Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 12/17/07
Copyright© 2007
Gustavo
Coronel.
All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels