World
Institutional
links
Welcome back on
26 -29 August,
ONS 2008
Bridging
the energy gap
is ONS 2006 theme,
from 22-25 August,
in Stavanger, Norway
Petroleumworld
Business
Partners:
Centre for
Global Energy
Studies
  |
|
Editorial Commentary
Scott Sullivan:
Argentina will protect Eastern Bolivia
It is clear from Brazilian President Lula da Silva’s meetings with Evo Morales that Argentina-- not Brazil --will the big winner from the break-up of Bolivia.
To begin, Evo Morales has destroyed the Bolivian state with his efforts to impose a new Chavista constitution on eastern Bolivia. The eastern Bolivian authorities have pushed back against Morales with daring and resolve. Eastern Bolivia has pushed back by proclaiming autonomy from Bolivia and its laws, reducing by two-thirds the tax revenues paid to Bolivia from natural gas exports, and establishing an eastern Bolivia police force.
The only ray of sunlight for Evo Morales came from his meeting early this week with Brazil’s president Lula da Silva. Most observers saw the Morales-da Silva meeting as a big win for Morales because Brazil offered $1 billion in economic assistance to Morales, primarily in funding for Bolivia-Brazil energy cooperation.
Morales, however, should take heed of President da Silva’s warning to Morales not to suppress eastern Bolivia. “Patience, patience, and patience” is the advice that Lula da Silva is offering Morales in his dealings with Bolivia’s opposition.
Unfortunately for Morales, he is out of time with the opposition. Time is not on Morales’s side as the opposition builds support in eastern Bolivia and takes step after step in building the foundations of a separate state. In other words, Evo Morales must strike hard and fast at Bolivia’s opposition. To borrow from Winston Churchill’s 1918 advice for dealing with the threat of the newly established Bolshevik regime, “We (that is the UK and the US) must strangle this baby in its crib.”
Even if Evo Morales can assume Brazil’s support for a preemptive military strike against eastern Bolivia, Morales is ignoring the true spoiler to his plans – Argentina.
Only two states can lay claim to eastern Bolivia and its vast reserves of natural gas -- Brazil and Argentina. Brazil is prepared to give Morales some space in resolving the eastern Bolivia crisis, for three reasons.
First, President da Silva values his close relations with President Bush and wants to avoid actions that would met with US disfavor, such as undermining Morales by supporting autonomy for eastern Bolivia.
Second, President da Silva views Brazil as a leader on the Latin America stage and the global stage. Lula does not want to become involved in a messy conflict with Evo Morales in a way that would detract from Brazil’s leadership image.
Third, Brazil is not in desperate need of eastern Bolivia’s enormous natural gas reserves. Brazil has made significant progress toward energy self sufficiency in recent years via energy conservation and the development of ethanol. Moreover, Brazil has good news on the energy front with the discovery of large offshore oil reserves. In a word, Brazil can do without eastern Bolivia’s natural gas.
Argentina, on the other hand, is in an entirely different situation than Brazil. Argentina is under intense pressure to reach out to assert its claim to eastern Bolivia.
Unlike Brazil, Argentina has no special relationship with the US to protect and will disregard US warnings to stay out of eastern Bolivia.
Unlike Brazil, Argentina has no pretensions to a global leadership role and will not pursue a policy of restraint towards eastern Bolivia to advance a global leadership agenda.
Unlike Bazil, Argentina is in desperate need of eastern Bolivia’s gas reserves. Indeed, energy shortages in Argentina are already weakening the economy. Argentina cannot afford to lose access to eastern Bolivi’s natural gas and must take steps to protect supplies from eastern Bolivia as a matter of Argentine national security.
Finally, unlike Brazil, Argentina will come under pressure from the Latin American states to intervene in eastern Bolivia. The Latin American states would prefer Argentine troops to Brazilian troops in eastern By protecting eastern Bolivia Argentina would pre-empt Brazil and restrain Brazil’s reputation as Latin America’s superpower.
Moreover, the Latin American states are concerned about the rise of the Ahmadinejad-Chavez-Morales axis. In particular, the Latin American states worry that Iran intends to use Venezuela and Bolivia as staging areas for terrorism in Latin America. Whereas Brazil has not voiced such fears, Argentina is now leading the fight – via Argentine and Interpol investigations into the role of former Iranian president Rafsanjani’s in Hezbollah bombings in Buenos Aires in 1995 -- to hold Iran accountable for its terrorism in the region.
In sum, the Latin American states should encourage Argentina to step forward as the protector of eastern Bolivia. Brazil, Chile, Peru and Paraguay cannot or will not intervene. Argentina will be the big winner in the Bolivia crisis, not Brazil.
Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.Editor's note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 12/19/07
Copyright© 2007 Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Send this story to a friend
Your feedback is important to us!
Readers' comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.Write to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.comBest Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels