Editorial
Commentary
Mary
Anastasia O'Grady: Bolivian
Breakup?
'Peace
on earth" may
be the season's greeting, but in the eastern part of Bolivia peace may
prove elusive. There, rumblings of civil war
hang in the air even in the midst of the preparations for the Christmas
celebration.
President Evo Morales has painted the conflict between his government
and his critics as a showdown between the country's indigenous poor and
rich Bolivians of European descent. But as his anti-democratic attempts
to consolidate power have begun to offend a larger cross section of the
nation, his class and racial warfare narrative is losing traction. Now
even the socialist government of Brazil, which has thus far supported Mr.
Morales so that its access to Bolivian natural gas might not be disrupted,
is beginning to show signs of discomfort with his strident approach toward
governance.
Tensions
between four eastern states -- Santa Cruz, Beni, Pando and Tarija --
and the central government have been running high all year. Last week
the strained relations took a turn for the worse, when the four governors
announced a series of "autonomy statutes." Polls show that
autonomy is now popular in two more states, Cochabamba and the former
Morales stronghold of Chuquisaca.
The
statutes are not quite declarations of secession, but in the eyes of
the Morales
government
they are audacious acts of rebellion. Vice President Álvaro
Garcia Linera has warned that the government plans to "use all its
powers" to rein in the "separatists." Yet the noise from
the palace hasn't fazed local leadership. Each of the four states has already
begun collecting signatures for referendums that, if passed, will ratify
the autonomy statutes.
After centuries of centralized power, Bolivia took major steps toward
decentralization in the mid-1990s. In 2005, for the first time ever, each
of the country's nine states elected their own governors.
Mr. Morales took power in January 2006 and had a different idea of how
Bolivia should be run. He and his hard-left party, Movimiento al Socialismo
(MAS), immediately began working to recentralize power through a rewrite
of the constitution. But he hit a roadblock when MAS was unable to garner
the two-thirds majority it needed in the constitutional assembly to adopt
the new, heavily socialist constitution.
To get around the problem, MAS unilaterally declared that the meeting
place of the assembly could be moved to wherever the party decided, and
then used force to keep out opponents. Meetings of MAS-only delegates have
since declared its version of the constitution ratified. The document not
only strips regional authorities of their political and economic power;
it also elevates citizens who qualify as indigenous above those of mixed
racial heritage. By any definition it is a putsch against democracy and
pluralism. But Mr. Morales seems to believe he can legitimize it all by
citing the grievances of the Bolivian poor.
Yet as Mr. Morales has become increasingly autocratic -- particularly
in passing his constitution outside of the legal process -- he has been
losing support. His problem seems to be that, while he was elected on a
platform that promised to do something about Bolivian poverty, a growing
segment of the population no longer views him as a leader who can solve
the problem. This is a fact not only in Bolivia's richer states but also
in some of the poorest.
Mr. Morales insists that opposition to his agenda is nothing more than
the resistance of rich states to sharing the country's wealth. It is true
that Tarija is the most prosperous state in Bolivia. But Beni, which also
opposes Mr. Morales, is running neck and neck with Chuquisaca as the second
poorest state in the country. Both the states of Oruro and La Paz, MAS
strongholds, have higher per-capita income.
During
his visit to New York this month, Beni Governor Ernesto Suárez
told me that the blame for poverty in his state lies chiefly with the central
government, which has long drained resources to feed the bureaucracy in
La Paz. Mr. Suárez's beef gets to the heart of the struggle -- the
question of whether concentrated power serves a nation well.
The autonomy statutes that he and the other governors have adopted aren't
militant declarations of independence. Instead they are rather tame claims
on the right to nominate state superior-court and electoral-court judges,
to tax at the state level and to keep a share of hydrocarbon revenues.
The states also want to be allowed to raise local police forces, decide
locally on land use, and protect the right to private-sector education.
They also do not recognize the Morales principle that La Paz has the authority
to dictate indigenous community privileges.
The
threat that Mr. Garcia Linera -- who is, by the way, an upper-class Bolivian
of European
descent and a former terrorist -- will stand by his
pledge to use force against the states is real. The states do not have
armies and would have no chance in a direct confrontation. But it is also
true that there is a growing recognition in the region that Evo has strayed
off the democracy path. Last week, Brazil's leftist President Luiz Inácio "Lula" da
Silva counseled the Bolivian to have "patience and more patience" with
the states. The not-so-subtle message was that if Mr. Morales tries to
mow down his democratic opposition, even Lula will have trouble scaring
up support for his socialist brother.
Mary
Anastasia O'Grady is a member of The Wall Street
Journal Editorial Board and editor of the "Americas," a
weekly column that appears every Monday in the Wall Street Journal.
Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: This commentary was originally published by The Wall Street Journal,
on 12/23/2007. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of
our
readers. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
News 12/25/07
Copyright© 2007
Mary
Anastasia O'Grady.
All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels