Editorial
Commentary
Christopher
Hitchens: Identity
Crisis
To
put it squarely and bluntly, is it because he is or is it because he isn't?
To phrase it another way, is it because of what he says or
what
he doesn't say? Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois is the current beneficiary
of a tsunami of drool. He sometimes claims credit on behalf of all Americans
regardless of race, color, creed, blah blah blah, though his recent speeches
appear also to claim a victory for blackness while his supporters—most
especially the white ones—sob happily that at last we can have
an African-American chief executive. Off to the side, snarling with barely
concealed rage, are the Clinton machine-minders, who, having failed to
ignite the same kind of identity excitement with an aging and resentful
female, are perhaps wishing that they had made more of her errant husband
having already been "our first black president."
Or perhaps not. Isn't
there something pathetic and embarrassing about this emphasis on shade?
And why is a man with a white mother considered
to be "black," anyway? Is it for this that we fought so hard
to get over Plessy v. Ferguson? Would we accept, if Obama's mother had
also been Jewish, that he would therefore be the first Jewish president?
The more that people claim Obama's mere identity to be a "breakthrough," the
more they demonstrate that they have failed to emancipate themselves from
the original categories of identity that acted as a fetter upon clear thought.
One can't exactly say
that Sen. Obama himself panders to questions of skin color. One of the
best chapters of his charming autobiography describes
the moment when his black Republican opponent in the Illinois Senate race—Alan
Keyes—accused him of possessing insufficient negritude because he
wasn't the descendant of slaves! Obama's decision to be light-hearted—and
perhaps light-skinned—about this was a milestone in itself. But are
we not in danger of emulating Keyes' insane mistake every time we bang
on about the senator's pigmentation? If you wanted a "black" president
or vice president so much, you could long ago have turned out en masse
for Angela Davis—also the first woman to be on a national ticket—or
for Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton. So, why didn't you? Could it have been
the politics?
Christopher
Hitchens is
a British-American author, journalist and literary critic. Petroleumworld
does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: This commentary was originally published by Slate is a daily magazine
on the Web, from the Washington Post, on Jan 7, 2008.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of
Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and
published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 01/10/08
Copyright© 2008
Slate. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels