Editorial
Commentary
VenEconomy: It
takes two to fight…
Colombian-Venezuelan relations are experiencing their worst crisis since the
Caldas affair in 1987.
Since December 2007, the Chávez administration has not lost a single opportunity
to stir things up by offending the Uribe administration in every way possible.
One of the latest attacks was when, in the company of his pal, President Daniel
Ortega, Chávez publicly accused Uribe of “cooking up” “an
armed confrontation against Venezuela” with the United States. He then
added to the confusion by giving the order to militarize the border, supposedly
to put a stop to the smuggling of merchandise out of the country.
But it takes two to fight, and it looks as though the Colombian Government is
not prepared to take up the gauntlet.
At the moment, the Colombian Government is concentrating on two basic issues:
1) successfully carrying out Plan Colombia to put an end to the attacks of the
FARC, the ELN and other Colombian narcoterrorist groups; and 2) the signing of
the Free Trade Agreement with the United States. In both cases, it needs public
opinion to be in its favor. And Uribe has made progress in that direction.
On his last trip, Uribe managed to get the support of the European Union, France,
Switzerland, and Spain for his crusade against narcoterrorism. And during the
visit of U.S. Secretary of State Condolezza Rice, he apparently obtained assurances
that Colombia has the support of the United States regardless of party differences.
It is clear that the Uribe administration will not break off relations with Caracas,
unless Chávez does something hair-brained. The Colombian Government wants
to preserve relations, ease tensions, and put the incident behind it. Besides
it feels, like any good statesman and rightly so, that it is in the interests
of both countries to seek areas of consensus.
Chávez, however, has shown no signs of wanting to let things be.
For many, one logical explanation of this bellicose unreasonableness of Chávez’s
would that he is using it as a tactic to drum up support and distract the attention
of people at home from the numerous economic and social problems that his mistaken
public policies have created. Another reason for seeking a confrontation with
Colombia could be the terrible consequences for the Venezuelan Government when
the facts of the Briefcase Affair become known, which will open a Pandora’s
Box of corruption and Hugo Chávez’ interference in the internal
affairs of other governments in the region.
Before doing anything further to escalate the conflict with Colombia, Chávez
should bear in mind that Venezuela would come out the loser in such a confrontation,
both militarily and in terms of trade and energy. It is also worth remembering
the Falklands War and the consequences it had for General Leopoldo Galtieri’s
Government in Argentina.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day,
as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
This
commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 01/28/2007. Petroleumworld
reprint this article in the interest of our readers. Petroleumworld
does not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 01/30/08
Copyright© 2008 VenEconomy.
All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels