Editorial
Commentary
Think
Tank: Oil policy puts PDVSA under pressure
EVENT: A US federal court yesterday confirmed an order freezing 315 million
dollars in a bank account held by Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA, in
the context of its contractual dispute with ExxonMobil.
SIGNIFICANCE: With global demand supporting oil prices close to 100 dollars
per barrel, developments in Venezuela (claiming the world's largest oil
reserves with its heavy oil) can exert an impact on the global picture
and will be closely watched.
ANALYSIS: The Venezuelan hydrocarbons sector has been undergoing a period
of substantial change. In 2006, foreign investors were obliged to surrender
their majority equity stakes in and control of conventional oil operations,
and enter into 'empresas mixtas' controlled by state oil company PDVSA.
Similar action on the four major heavy oil upgrading projects in the Orinoco
Belt followed in 2007.
In May 2007, PDVSA took over operational control of the four heavy oil
projects, valued in excess of 30 billion dollars. The six foreign oil company
investors were given until late June to reach agreement on PDVSA taking
a 60% stake in these projects. Chevron, BP, Total and Statoil accepted
the deals on offer, while ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips refused, opting
to negotiate for compensation . The book value of ExxonMobil's 41.7% stake
in the Cerro Negro project was about 750 million dollars at the time but
their fair market valuation is perhaps three times this sum.
Asset freeze. Having failed to reach agreement with Caracas on the value
of its Cerro Negro assets, in September 2007 ExxonMobil filed a request
for arbitration with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment
Disputes (ICSID) in Washington. Thereafter, on February 7 the company announced
that it had secured court orders in the United States, United Kingdom,
Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles freezing up to 12 billion dollars
of PDVSA's assets (including 315 million dollars in a US bank account)
in these jurisdictions, thus preventing PDVSA from selling or transferring
assets.
These latest legal moves, to prevent assets being transferred to jurisdictions
beyond the reach of enforcement of any future arbitration award, appear
to have surprised PDVSA, although not the industry, which expects ExxonMobil
to take a tough line on contractual issues.
Consequences. A number of consequences are likely:
- Country
risk will increase -- the price of Venezuela's dollar-denominated bonds
has
already fallen -- and PDVSA's borrowing costs will rise.
- If
these orders are sustained, PDVSA's ability to dispose of/transfer assets
in the normal
course of business will be severely impaired, with
potential buyers, investors and partners moving very cautiously until these
matters are resolved
- This
could force PDVSA to use the cash flow and asset base of its US subsidiary,
Citgo (whose assets are not attached) to fund its activities,
potentially 'hollowing out' Citgo.
- With
PDVSA expected to appeal, this could be a long and expensive process;
arbitration
hearings alone could take 3-4 years.
- Were
ExxonMobil to win a major arbitration award and recover full compensation,
the four
companies that settled -- reportedly at less
than half their stakes' estimated market value -- may be tempted to review
their agreements and call for equal treatment.
- ConocoPhillips,
with assets whose net book value reached 4.5 billion dollars, could follow
a similar path, although it currently appear
to be taking a more conciliatory approach.
- ExxonMobil
probably warned the US government of its planned course of action, which
will undoubtedly exacerbate already severely strained
bilateral relations. Caracas has accused Washington of being behind the
ExxonMobil lawsuit, and President Hugo Chavez has halted oil sales to ExxonMobil
and threatened to cut off supplies to the United States (though this appears
impracticable).
Hydrocarbon production. Reliable published statistics on oil production
are scarce. Although the Central Bank reported that crude oil production
fell by 5.3% in 2007, high-end production claims by the Venezuelan authorities
-- around 3.3 million barrels per day (b/d) -- contrast with much lower
estimates from the IEA (International Energy Agency) and Cambridge Energy
Research Associates (around 2.3 million b/d). Some reports suggest that
Venezuelan crude production has declined by nearly 30% since Chavez took
office in 1999.
Other evidence tends to support the view that production is falling:
- Last year, PDVSA
said it needed nearly 200 rigs but, at the end of the year, only some
70 were active -- and the number of wells drilled
declined by some 30% between 2001 and 2005.
- Venezuela,
along with Iran, consistently opposes any increase in OPEC production
and reacts
to modest falls in the oil price by advocating
production cuts. While unwelcome to consumer countries, this is an entirely
logical stance for a producer unable to maintain its output.
Investment burden. Venezuela now directly controls all conventional and
heavy oil production, with foreign investors allowed at most a 40% stake
in oil exploration, development and production. However, there are costs
attaching to this policy:
- One
estimate suggests that foreign investment is as much as 6 billion dollars
below
the level anticipated under the national strategy.
- Foreign
investors will have to be compensated for their lost equity. Where there
is disagreement,
arbitration and even court action could persist
and possibly discourage new foreign investment.
- Some
important foreign investors have left the country and despite Venezuela's
obvious
resource attractions, may not return under the current
regime. With the international oil industry struggling to replace production,
the loss of oil production in Venezuela last year will not be quickly forgotten.
- Remaining
foreign investors are likely to resist investment beyond necessary maintenance
and contractual obligations. Total recently signed
heavy oil study agreements with PDVSA to appraise reserves and examine
a production project -- a relatively low-cost way of keeping an option
open.
- PDVSA
will have to bear at least 60% of all future oil investments -- a challenge
that will increase if anticipated moves to take a similar
level of control in the gas industry transpire.
PDVSA priorities. With continuing high oil prices, a conventionally managed
PDVSA could probably meet its investment needs largely from its own resources.
However, non-oil demands are rising, with reports of a new structure being
introduced, with seven new subsidiaries covering agriculture, services,
industrial, naval, communal gas, engineering and construction, and urban
development.
PDVSA had 48,000 employees in 1998-99, just under 75,000 in late 2007,
with 110,000 forecast by end-2009. Working directly through PDVSA allows
the government to re-direct oil revenues to meet domestic and foreign policy
objectives within the company, without checks and balances or external
scrutiny. This makes it difficult for PDVSA to maintain the necessary focus
on its core business. Even a modest reduction in oil prices will have a
significant impact on PDVSA's revenues. Unless prices continue to rise,
revenues will fall. PDVSA may lack funds to meet its 'stay in business
requirements', let alone grow production and invest in major new developments.
With oil revenues accounting for an increasing percentage of national
income, the future of the country becomes ever more closely tied to oil
production. This is falling and the political imperatives now driving PDVSA's
non-oil priorities run the risk of accelerating this decline.
CONCLUSION: There is a significant risk that headline numbers on economic
performance supported by high oil prices could be masking serious challenges
to Venezuela's longer-term viability. Any modest downward pressure on the
oil price could force Chavez to make difficult choices between domestic
social spending, international commitments and hydrocarbon investment.
The ratcheting up of ExxonMobil's dispute with PDVSA would intensify these
potential dilemmas.
The
above analysis was send to us by a reader.
Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 02/14/08
Copyright© 2008
Petroleumworld. All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels