Editorial
Commentary
VenEconomy:
Desperation, cynicism or ignorance?
Last week, the National Assembly rejected the alleged “action of
economic and judicial terrorism” that, according to its members,
ExxonMobil (and its “accomplices”) is taking against PDVSA.
It also requested that lawsuits be filed against former parliamentarians
and government officials who approved the contracts signed as part of
the opening up of the oil sector in the 90s, calling them “traitors.”
The majority of government spokesmen, and many outside the government,
are calling the signing of agreements and alliances with foreign investors
that included clauses providing for the settlement of disputes before
international courts and arbitration centers acts of treason.
Those who adopt this position reveal either their total shamelessness
or crass ignorance, to say the least.
It is very difficult for anyone not to know that, today, no foreign company
anywhere will run the risk of signing agreements or contracts in Venezuela
unless they include clauses that guarantee their investments against
possible disputes or future lawsuits. It is more than evident that foreign
investors will only come to the country if there are sufficient guarantees
to protect their capital.
Much less can anyone be unaware that only impartial, objective courts
are capable of handing down fair decisions for all parties involved in
litigation. And it cannot be ignored that, in Venezuela, it is practically
impossible to find a court that is allowed to act impartially in cases
against the Chávez administration.
That being the way things are, anyone who maintains that submitting contractual
disputes to the decisions of international arbitration courts is treason
is either a cynic or a loudmouth.
Not only that, those who now criticize and condemn arbitration clauses,
forget that it was this same Chávez administration that promulgated
the Law on Foreign Investments in Venezuela, which guarantees investing
companies the right to settle any disputes they may have with their Venezuelan
partners before international courts.
These gentlemen also forget that these guarantees are a two-way street,
because, just as they protect foreign companies, they could also protect
Venezuelan companies and the Venezuelan Government should they wish to
enforce a court decision abroad at some future date.
Apart from that, they also seem to forget that all the bonds of the Republic
of Venezuela issued in recent years include clauses that say, “Venezuela
agrees to submit to the justice of the Federal Court of the United States,
the State Court of New Cork, and the courts of England” and that
it relinquishes “some (other) immunities and defenses.”
And most important of all, they forget that Venezuela is part if a community
of countries with which it seeks and needs to trade and that, therefore,
it is imperative that it respect the game rules that have been agreed,
if it does not want to be abominated by that same community
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day,
as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 02/20/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of
our readers.
Editor's
Note:
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 02/20/08
Copyright© 2008
VenEconomy . All rights reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels