Editorial
Commentary
Pedro
M. Burrelli:
What
do we do now with Mr. Chavez?
Jackson Diehl, Deputy Editorial Page Editor of the WashPost,
poses the real question of the day: What do we do now with Mr. Chavez?
Now refers after we have come upon a treasure trove of evidence to proof
- beyond reasonable doubt - his deep and criminal alliance with the FARC
. The facts spurting out of the four laptops captured in what has turned
to be a semana horribilis for the terrorist gang establish a pattern
of complicity hard to match in the annals of state collaboration with
terrorists. The match between technology and savagery has yielded evidence
that, as Diehl states forcefully, cannot be ignored by anyone, much less
the administration that has made fighting terrorism its motto and be
all.
For
the past few years, the post-Noriega period, the Bush administration
has shown
a cerebral ability to avoid satisfying Mr. Chavez
dream of a
mano-a-mano confrontation with the "Devil", George W. Bush, himself
or his top surrogates for that case. Credit is deserved for the discipline
this entailed and the success the policy has brought. The fact is that
Chavez is hounded now by his own deeds and rejected in growing numbers
by his own people. This turn of events is not the fault of the "'evil
empire", this is all Mr. Chavez's handiwork. He is rejected by a growing
number of his counterparts in the region and the world - with the few exceptions
of those that are addicted to his cash, and this is not the result of any
US strategy other than refusing to provide smoke to the screen Mr. Chavez
was trying to build to cover his true colors. The US President, strong-willed
as ever, has refused to even pronounce Mr. Chavez's name when asked such
point blank question as "Who is the President of Venezuela? This entire
policy stance has yielded success, congratulations Mr. President, Ms. Rice,
Mr.Hadley, Mr. Shannon and Mr. Fisk, now lets focus on the facts in the
laptops of his Neanderthal allies in the FARC. Mr. Chavez must be brought
to justice without causing further suffering on his people who although
responsible for his election are defenseless in a country with no legal
recourse left. Mr. Chavez and his cronies, starting with the Interior Minister
Rodriguez Chacin are the well deserving guinea pigs for smart sanctions,
and this means laser precision that punishes the guilty and spares the
rest. Venezuela has a monumental reconstruction task ahead, we will need
the help of the international community for sure, but before this task
can begin we need the help of the world in ridding the country of the criminals
that attempted to hoodwink all and almost succeeded. PMB
The FARC's Guardian Angel
By Jackson Diehl
Latin
American nations and the Bush administration spent the past week loudly
arguing over what censure, if any, Colombia should face for a
bombing raid that killed one of the top leaders of the FARC terrorist
group at a jungle camp in Ecuador. More quietly, they are just beginning
to consider a far more serious and potentially explosive question: What
to do about the revelation that Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez
forged a strategic alliance with the FARC aimed at Colombia's democratic
government.
First reports of the
documents recovered from laptops at the FARC camp spoke of promises by
Chávez to deliver up to $300 million to a group
renowned for kidnapping, drug trafficking and massacres of civilians; they
also showed that Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa was prepared to remove
from his own army officers who objected to the FARC's Ecuadoran bases.
But in their totality,
the hundreds of pages of documents so far made public by Colombia paint
an even more chilling picture. The raid appears
to have preempted a breathtakingly ambitious "strategic plan" agreed
on by Chávez and the FARC with the initial goal of gaining international
recognition for a movement designated a terrorist organization by both
the United States and Europe. Chávez then intended to force Colombian
President Álvaro Uribe to negotiate a political settlement with
the FARC, and to promote a candidate allied with Chávez and the
FARC to take power from Uribe.
All this is laid out
in a series of three e-mails sent in February to the FARC's top leaders
by Iván Márquez and Rodrigo Granda,
envoys who held a series of secret meetings with Chávez. Judging
from the memos, Chávez did most of the talking: He outlined a five-stage
plan for undermining Uribe's government, beginning with the release of
several of the scores of hostages the FARC is holding.
The first e-mail, dated
Feb. 8, discusses the money: It says that Chávez,
whom they call "angel," "has the first 50 [million] available
and has a plan to get us the remaining 200 in the course of the year." Chávez
proposed sending the first "packet" of money "through the
black market in order to avoid problems." He said more could be arranged
by giving the FARC a quota of petroleum to sell abroad or gasoline to retail
in Colombia or Venezuela.
Chávez then got to the plans that most interested him. He wanted
the FARC to propose collecting all of its hostages in the open, possibly
in Venezuela, for a proposed exchange for 500 FARC prisoners in Colombian
jails. Chávez said he would travel to the area for a meeting with
the FARC's top leader, Manuel Marulanda, and said the presidents of Ecuador,
Nicaragua and Bolivia would accompany him. Meanwhile, Chávez said
he would set up a new diplomatic group, composed of those countries and
the FARC, plus Mexico, Brazil and Argentina, for the purpose of recognizing
the FARC as a legitimate "belligerent" in Colombia and forcing
Uribe into releasing its prisoners.
In "the early morning hours," the FARC envoys recounted in a
Feb. 9 e-mail, Chávez reached the subject of whether the release
of Ingrid Betancourt, a former Colombian presidential candidate who is
the FARC's best-known hostage, would complicate his plan to back a pro-FARC
alternative to Uribe. "He invites the FARC to participate in a few
sessions of analysis he has laid out for following the Colombian political
situation," the e-mail concluded.
Assuming these documents
are authentic -- and it's hard to believe that the cerebral and calculating
Uribe would knowingly hand over forgeries
to the world media and the Organization of American States -- both the
Bush administration and Latin American governments will have fateful decisions
to make about Chávez. His reported actions are, first of all, a
violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1373, passed in September
2001, which prohibits all states from providing financing or havens to
terrorist organizations. More directly, the Colombian evidence would be
more than enough to justify a State Department decision to cite Venezuela
as a state sponsor of terrorism. Once cited, Venezuela would be subject
to a number of automatic sanctions, some of which could complicate its
continuing export of oil to the United States. A cutoff would temporarily
inconvenience Americans -- and cripple Venezuela, which could have trouble
selling its heavy oil in other markets.
For now, the Bush administration
appears anxious to avoid this kind of confrontation. U.S. intelligence
agencies are analyzing the Colombian evidence;
officials say they will share any conclusions with key Latin American governments.
Yet those governments have mostly shrunk from confronting Chávez
in the past, and some have quietly urged Bush to take him on. If the president
decides to ignore clear evidence that Venezuela has funded and conspired
with an officially designated terrorist organization, he will flout what
has been his first principle since Sept. 11, 2001.
The
Washington Post/ Monday, March 10, 2008; A15
Pedro
M. Burelli is a former Executive Board Member of
PDVSA. Prior to that, Burelli was Head of JPMorgan Capital Corporation – Latin
America. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views
. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 03/13/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels