Editorial
Commentary
VenEcconomy
:
PDVSA’s
wings beginning to be clipped
Chávez’s
Government is very quick to toot its own horn and sell, no matter how
insignificant, the victory to the population as if the had just won
the battle to end all wars.
The latest of these glorious feats to be fed to the population has
to do with the British Superior Court’s overturning of the judicial
order to freeze up to $12 billion of PDVSA’s foreign assets until
the dispute with ExxonMobil regarding the illegal “migration” of
its Cerro Negro facility in the Orinoco Oil Belt is resolved.
In fact, the British Superior Court’s decision didn’t surprise
anyone and PDVSA’s “victory” is really no big deal
and more tactical than anything else.
On the one hand, the British Court decided that it was not competent
to decide over the ExxonMobil vs PDVSA case, and so sentenced. On the
other hand, it was going to be all up hill for ExxonMobil to prove
the urgency of the matter and risk that PDVSA , a company with more
than $56 billion in assets, could use legal tactics and maneuvers to
separate itself from or hide all its assets in order not to pay the
U.S. based oil company.
In VenEconomy’s opinion, the British Court’s decision has
left matters pretty much the way they were and there is still a long
road ahead for PDVSA.
First, the order to freeze PDVSA’s assets issued in Holland and
the Dutch Antilles are still in effect. It’s worth pointing out
that besides the assets PDVSA has in the United States, the main bulk
of its assets are in precisely these two countries, subject to Dutch
laws.
Second, PDVSA still has an order to freeze $315 million in assets pending
in New York.
Third, and what in VenEconomy’s opinion carried the most weight
regarding the decision handed down by the British Court, was that it
clearly classified the “migration” order of Cerro Negro
from a strategic association to a mixed company as an expropriation
that requires adequate and just compensation for ExxonMobil.
Fourth, and even more important, the international arbitrage process
is still ongoing, and it’s in PDVSA’s best interest that
the dispute with ExxonMobil be resolved by both parties reaching an
agreement as quickly as possible. The fact that this dispute is still
not resolved and the pending dispute it has with ConocoPhilips, constitute
an important barrier when it comes to foreign companies investing in
Venezuela in order to help develop the country.
But, the sad truth of the matter is that PDVSA is taking advantage
of all this legal mess to distract people’s attention from the
real critical issue: that the goose that laid the golden egg is in
serious bad shape and agonizing.
What’s more, the arrogance that is so characteristic of Chávez’s
Government doesn’t allow it to consider that other than ExxonMobil
and ConocoPhilips, it’s only the other big international oil
companies like Chevron, Shell, and Total that are the only ones with
the technology and the finances to build and operate deep conversion
refineries necessary for developing the Orinoco Oil Belt. And, unfortunately
for PDVSA, they all operate under the same ethical and legal regulations
that ExxonMobil does.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic and financial
area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day, as seen by
VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 03/24/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an
endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments
and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are
posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 03/26/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels