Editorial
Commentary
VenEconomy :
Getting desperate
Despite the fact that oil prices have steadily remained at record high
levels, the feeling is that the country is in the midst of a fiscal crisis.
Though there aren’t any official figures to back this up, one can
infer that the fiscal situation is more than just tight, by the many signs
the Government is showing.
Among the signs we are referring to would be: the implementation of the
Financial Transaction Tax which has had a negative effect with regard to
inflation; the adjustment PDVSA has made with regard to its payment schedule,
now requiring that accounts be paid within 8 days after delivery instead
of the 30 days that was previously allowed; delayed loan payments; as well
as the President’s statements admitting that funds for the Missions
are scarce.
And just recently, the National Assembly has provided yet another sign
that the Government is scrapping the bottom of the barrel and squeezing
funds out of where ever it can, by announcing that it is thinking about
implementing a Tax on “Windfall Profits” to be applied on the
oil industry.
Unlike the Financial Transaction Tax which is inflationary, but a big money
maker for the Government, generating more than Bs.F.2.0 million a month,
a Windfall Profits Tax would not bring in very much since PDVSA is the
one that generates almost 90% of all oil revenues in the country. The company
already belongs to the State who gets 100% of its profits through royalties,
taxes, dividends, and withheld earnings. In other words, a Tax increase
would simple cut back on dividends or withheld earnings. So, all a new
Tax would be doing is passing resources from one pocket to another, all
within the same State.
A Windfall Profit Tax would affect every one of PDVSA’s minority
shareholder partners, which are already having their profits taxed by almost
90% between royalties and taxes, the highest percentage in the world.
Since we are talking about minority shareholders, a Windfall Profits Tax
would not bring in much revenue, but it would have a high cost in terms
of the country’s credibility, and trust in its contracts, and the
relevance of its laws, which supposedly are there to guarantee to foreign
investors that the rules of the game aren’t going to change, or at
least not change for the next 10 years. Besides, this Tax would end up
being arbitrary and discretional. For starters, you’d have to start
by establishing a point of reference in order to define the parameters
which would determine what an acceptable profit level would be. And, of
course, the Government would probably set these levels unilaterally.
So, if this Tax were to be implemented, it would just be one more negative
incentive for investors, driving desperately needed foreign business capital
away from Venezuela. Investors will simple take their money and go in search
of safer and better opportunities. This price is much too high for the
country to pay and it would condemn it to underdevelopment and poverty.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day,
as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 03/28/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an
endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments
and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are
posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 04/01/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels