Editorial
Commentary
VenEconomy: Double
message
No matter how much the Government wants to deny it, a dual foreign exchange system
is closer to being a reality than they thought it would be.
On March 31st, the London Financial Times reported that an advisor to the Ministry
of Finance had confirmed that the Government is considering applying a dual foreign
exchange system. The source stated that the current official foreign exchange
rate of Bs.F.2.15:$ would remain for the import of essential goods, especially
foods and medicines, and luxury goods and tourists will have to buy their US-dollars
at a higher exchange rate which the Government expects to be able to maintain
at between Bs.F3.00:$ and Bs.F3.5:$”.
It seems that the mechanism that the Government has in mind is to offer importers
US-dollar denomination bonds payable in bolivars, and not by selling US-dollars
directly on the stock market, as has been the custom up until now. This system
would allow buyers to freely convert their bonds into foreign currency in New
York on the parallel market.
However, on April 2nd, the Minister of Finance, Rafael Isea, categorically denied
that the Administration is evaluating introducing a dual exchange mechanism and
insisted that the official exchange will remain just as it has been since 2005.
Despite this emphatic denial, the Minister contradicted himself by confirming
what his advisor had said when he added on to the statement released in London
by announcing a new issue of debt, denominated in US-dollars payable in bolivars,
aimed at importers. The Minister explained that this issue “attempts to
allow businesses to acquire resources for financing in foreign currency so that
they can streamline the import process.” Put this way, the dual exchange
system would be a reality much sooner than expected.
The biggest problem, in VenEconomy’s opinion, is that the international
market will not be able to accept such a significant volume of Venezuelan papers.
Also, Venezuelan foreign credit has seen better days. A good example of this
is that according to Merinvest the “risk-country prime” is over 638
base points compared to Brazil’s prime, for example, which is at 282 points,
Colombia 255 points, and México at 168 points.
Furthermore, all indicators point to specialized investment funds not having
enough space for Venezuelan bonds, even if they are high yield. If this is the
case, where will the buyers come from? From FONDEN? Or, from the BCV, making
purchase through intermediaries?
So, the dual exchange system that the Government is considering will not be enough
to satisfy the foreign currency demand which leads one to expect that the dual
mechanism will be short lived and that the price of foreign currency will dramatically
increase soon. So, the Government won’t find the stability that they were
looking for.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day,
as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 04/03/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an
endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments
and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are
posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 04/04/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels