Editorial
Commentary
VenEconomy:
A suspicious index
A few weeks ago, the Government and the Central Bank of Venezuela
(BCV) inaugurated the new Consumer Price Index (CPI) with much fanfare.
Besides including samples from the Caracas Metropolitan area and Maracaibo,
it also includes samples from around the country.
The new National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) includes samples from the
10 most important cities around the country, as well as 74 other medium
and small sized communities, and rural areas which are included under “Rest,” which
will have a weight of 45% within the NCPI.
Unfortunately, this new index doesn’t inspire much confidence. On
the one hand, because it is missing some data in its makeup, and on the
other, because of the discrepancies its figures reflect.
For example, nobody understands why the 74 other communities and rural
areas were assigned a weight of 45% and why their names haven’t been
announced; even more so, when one understands that it is a fact that more
than three fourth of the country’s population lives in the 10 main
cities around the country.
This suggests that the rural area has been given too high of a percentage
to represents its national consumption. By its nature, the rural area is
the area less affected by inflation.For example, the cost of transportation
does not influence the economy as much in the rural areas as it does in
the cities.
Furthermore, the heterogeneous nature of the 74 other communities labeled “Rest,” make
it so that they are easily influenced by other variables that the Government
has put into play, like the barter system and the issue of local currency
which could misrepresent a drop in prices, creating an artificial value.
The doubts that were circulating about the new CPI were reinforced this
past April 7th when the new index was published, which reflected a surprising
drop in inflation in March compared to January and February. According
to the new index, January inflation was at 3.1%, February at 2.1%, and
March at 1.7%.
It’s logical to think that the average cost of living at the national
level is lower than the cost of living in Caracas, but what is not logical
is that inflation in the rural areas is consistently going to be less than
inflation in the cities. According to the BCV, the CPI in Caracas was higher
than the National index by 0.3% in January, 0.2% in February, and 0.6%
in March.
Another thing that indicates that things aren’t quite right with
the NCPI is when you compare the Cendas family basket calculations, made
by the recognized analysis center of the National Federation of Teachers,
which have managed these figures in a very disciplined manner. According
to Cendas, the family basket increased by 9.1% during the first quarter
in contrast to the 8.2% increase reflected by the traditional Metropolitan
area index and the “mere” 7.1% increase posted by the new index.
At VenEconomy, we believe that the lack of information in the structure
of the new index, coupled with the lack of any official explanation concerning
the new adjustments have left the whole situation wide open to doubts and
speculation about this just being another of the Government’s attempts
to manipulate figures in order to make Hugo Chávez’ Administration
look good.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the day,
as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 04/14/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 04/15/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels