Editorial
Commentary
VenEconomy:
Destructive shows of bravado
From Rome,
the Minister of Energy and Oil/President of PDVSA, Rafael Ramírez,
announced that, at the end of April, Venezuela would file a complaint
regarding the Investment Promotion and Protection Treaty
signed with the Netherlands in 1996.
The grounds for this complaint is apparently the “abusive use” by
different oil companies, both state- and privately owned, of benefits grant
Dutch companies under the treaty because they registered in Holland as “companies
native to the country, as in the case of ExxonMobil.”
There are rumors that the Venezuelan Government is also considering filing
complaints regarding all treaties of this type that Venezuela has signed
to date with different countries.
What is a bi-national investment treaty?
It is a business agreement whereby the parties establish clear, transparent
rules for engaging in a given economic activity that are easy to implement
and monitor and also clear guarantees, among them, equal treatment, repatriation
of profits, labor and environmental rules, intellectual property, and competition
and service policies.
But one of the key –indeed essential- elements of a bi-national investment
treatment is a dispute settlement clause establishing that the parties
shall resort to a neutral arbitration center, such as the World Bank’s
International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
or the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris, to settle their disputes
when they are unable to reach an agreement.
To illustrate the importance of this clause, let us imagine a football
match in Cali between the Venezuelan team, the Vino Tinto, and the Colombian
team, where the referee is Colombian. This would be quite unacceptable.
The same happens in the case of investments and business: the referee must
always be impartial.
Venezuela’s complaint regarding this international treaty with the
Netherlands is yet another example of the arrogance and highhandedness
of a government that, in its nine years in office, has credited to its
account innumerable infringements of the property rights and economic freedoms
of domestic and foreign investors.
Minister/President Ramírez’ announcement is a show of bravado
that reflects a lack of maturity that should come as no surprise to anyone.
However, what is surprising is the ignorance it reveals. Or could it be
that the numerous advisors and lawyers at the service of PDVSA and the
Ministry of Energy and Oil have not explained to the Minister/President
that filing such a complaint will not exonerate the country from its liabilities
with companies that made their investments following the signing of a bi-national
treaty and, consequently, will not affect the decision that ExxonMobil
obtained to freeze up to $12 billion of PDVSA’s international assets?
Would someone please explain to the Minister/President, in clear, simple
language, that these treaties merely serve to promote the investments that
the country so badly needs and to protect Venezuela in the event of business
disputes with foreign companies and governments.
VenEconomy is a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues of the
day, as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld does
not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy, on 04/25/2007.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as
an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private
comments
and
do not
necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments
are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments
on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 04/28/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency.
All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
Readers'
comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels