Op-Ed Commentary
VenEconomy:
All show and no Substance
One of the first “successes” that Chávez’s
Government heralded before everyone, and that international public
opinion enthusiastically applauded, was the campaign to eradicate
illiteracy in Venezuela. In October 2005, the Government celebrated
by saying that Unesco had declared Venezuela “a Nation Free
of Illiteracy.” Today, it’s more and more evident
that these achievements aren’t true and that they constitute
just another charade perpetrated by the Bolivarian Government.
Since the beginning, the Robinson Mission, the one responsible
for implementing Chávez’s literacy plan, was more
talk than action. In the first place, the Unesco never declared
Venezuela “Free of Illiteracy,” they only approved
of the Government’s literacy program. Furthermore, there’s
nothing new about the Government’s literacy program or the
Robinson Mission. It’s just a new version of the Acude Program
that was so successful implemented in the 90s, and raised Venezuela’s
literacy level to one of the highest on the continent.
What’s more, Venezuelans need only look around and take
stock of their everyday lives to realize how false the claim that
illiteracy has been eradicated is.
A few days ago, Luis Pedro España, a researcher at the
Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, commented that
the highest levels of illiteracy existed among our senor citizens.
España continued to say that, the natural aging of the
population and the passing of time is lowering the illiteracy
level, not because people are learning to read but because those
that are illiterate are dying.
Another jab regarding the Robinson Mission myth came from the
economist, Francisco Rodríguez, in an interview with Milagros
Socorro for the newspaper El Nacional, concerning the results
published in “¿Libre de analfabetismo? Una mirada
cercana a la campaña de alfabetización Robinson
de Venezuela” (“Free of illiteracy? A closer look
at the Robinson Literacy campaign in Venezuela), which was carried
out by an academic research team from the University of Berkeley
and Maryland, from the US.
This research project, based on the official numbers provided
by the National Statistics Institute taken from Home Surveys reveals
that in Venezuela, for the second quarter of 2005, there were
1,016,000 illiterate people. This means that the number of illiterate
people went down by only 92,000 in a year and a half, and not
the more than a million people that the Government preaches. What’s
more, of these 92,000 people which are now not illiterate, for
many of them it is due to the population’s natural aging
process previously mentioned here by Luis Pedro España.
Furthermore, according to Rodríguez, not only is it a lie
that illiteracy has been eradicated, but the Program’s cost
is not reasonable: US$543 per person (not including school supplies
like books, VHS, tapes, family libraries, and glasses), which
makes it one of the most expensive literacy programs in the world,
after Bolivia’s program which costs US$199 per person. Another
curious fact is that the program had more literacy teachers (210,000
according the Ministry of Education) than people who actually
became literate through the program (92,000 according to the National
Statistics Institute).
So, just like with PDVSA’s production, the cost of living,
and the Governments social programs, they’re all show and
no substance.
VenEconomy
is
a Venezuela's leading specialized publisher in the economic
and financial area. VenEconomy's Points of View on the issues
of the day, as seen by VenEconomy during the last week. Petroleumworld
not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by VenEconomy,
on 10/16/2006. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest
of our readers.
Fair use
Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian
significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of
the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works
published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator
of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored
by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce,
reprint, or broadcast
Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original
source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done
within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from
this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use',
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld
10/17/06
Copyright
©2006 Veneconomy. All Rights Reserved
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels