Lagniappe
Breffni
O'Rourke:
Venezuela's flight of fancy
Western
arms experts have dismissed the idea of Venezuela selling Iran US-built
F-16 fighter planes as a far-fetched "political snipe", and
analysts also said the plan had no military significance.
Member
of the Chiefs of Staff General Alberto Mueller Rojas has suggested that
his country might sell its entire force of 21 US-built F-16 fighter
planes to Iran.
Andrew
Brooks, a military-aviation specialist at the International Institute
of Strategic Studies in London, said he did not take the scenario seriously.
"I think it is part of the - what can I say - theatrical performances
between President [Hugo] Chavez and Washington," Brooks said.
Brooks
is referring to the increasingly antagonistic relations between the
hardline leftist leader Chavez and the administration of President George
W Bush.
Aging
planes
The F-16s were delivered to Venezuela in 1983-84, more than two decades
ago. Although the type is still generally regarded as one of the world's
best lightweight fighters, the early Venezuelan version is outdated
in its capability to act as a platform for modern electronically controlled
weapons.
"These
are aeroplanes designed to be used 10, 20, 30, [or] 40 years ago,"
Brooks said. "If you use them now against anybody of renown in
the Middle East, you will get hacked out of the sky."
Another
military aviation expert, Peter Felstead, the editor of Jane's Defense
Weekly, said the Venezuelan suggestion sounded like it was designed
mainly "to annoy President Bush".
"I
see this purely as a sort of an antagonistic political snipe,"
Felstead said. "I would be surprised if in reality this deal went
ahead."
A
spare-parts fix
Felstead said that one of Venezuela's dilemmas was how to keep the American-built
F-16s airworthy in the face of a lack of spare parts from the United
States. Iran would presumably face the same problem.
The
maintenance problem could be a key reason that Caracas is considering
selling the entire fleet. According to Rojas, it is planning to buy
Russian-built Sukhoi-35 fighters instead.
The
Venezuelans are suggesting that Washington has been refusing for some
time to send spare parts for the F-16s. But Washington insists this
is not the case.
State
Department spokesman Sean McCormack noted that on May 15 that the US
did indeed ban all arms sales to Venezuela, accusing that country of
failing to provide assistance in the "war against terrorism".
But
McCormack said that under the rules of the ban, existing commercial
supply and maintenance contracts were allowed to stand until they expired.
He said that in the case of Venezuela, some contracts would last until
2009.
Heard
it before?
McCormack also said Venezuela was bound by a previous agreement not
to sell the jets without prior US approval. He downplayed the significance
of Rojas' remarks.
"This
is something they [the Venezuelans] had talked about before. I think
the last time they said they were going to sell the F-16s to China,
[but] China had no interest in that," McCormack said. "And
also I would note that there seems to be a little difference of opinion
within the Venezuelan government on this [latest] matter. The minister
of defense, I believe, has backed away from this statement. So I think
this is overheated rhetoric."
McCormack
was referring to remarks in Caracas by Defense Minister Admiral Orlando
Maniglia Ferreira. The minister said there were currently no formal
plans to sell the F-16s to Iran or any other country. And the Iranian
Embassy in Caracas said no deal involving the warplanes had been proposed
by Venezuela.
Ironically,
the first foreign customer for the F-16 - beyond four European North
Atlantic Treaty Organization countries - was Iran. The Shah's government
ordered 160 aircraft for the Imperial Iranian Air Force in 1976. But
the Iranian Revolution of 1979 prompted the cancellation of that order.
Many
of the F-16s initially intended for Iran were eventually sold to Israel.
Breffni
O'Rourke is
with Radio Free Europe. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
Editor's
note: This commentary was originally published by Radio
Free Europe,
on May, 2006. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of
our readers. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either
for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor
is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld
articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source,
http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair
use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld
05/24/06
Copyright
©2006 Radio Free Europe. All Rights Reserved.