World

Bolivia

Peru

Trinidad &
Tobago

Venezuela






Very usefull links



Institutional
links

 




Lagniappe

 

 

 



Scott Haggett: Alberta royalty hike
far cry from nationalization




Alberta has just joined Venezuela, Russia, Kazakhstan and Bolivia as it looks to enjoy a bigger share of the cash windfalls coming from record high oil prices.
(In U.S. dollars unless noted)

A wide swath of oil-producing regions have moved in the past months to take cash away from oil companies and put it into government coffers by raising royalties or taking over producing properties.

The long list includes Russia moving to take control of foreign-owned oil properties, the nationalization of natural-gas fields in Bolivia, Venezuela assuming majority control of heavy-oil projects and hiking its royalties, and Kazakhstan's bid to take a bigger stake in a massive oil field under the Caspian Sea.

But by those international standards, Alberta's announcement on Thursday that it would boost its take from the industry by about C$1.4 billion ($1.46 billion) a year, starting in 2009, was a very mild step -- even according to the critics of the new policy.

"We've not seen any kind of the expropriation or insularity" seen elsewhere, said Pierre Alvarez, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, which lobbies on behalf of big oil companies.

ALBERTA'S SHARE

Ecuador moved this month to tax 99 percent of windfall profits for oil companies operating there, a measure estimated to cost producers in the South American country $830 million.

In contrast, the Alberta changes will see the government's share of oil sands revenues rise to around 56 to 66 percent of revenues, depending on oil prices, up from 47 percent.

Conventional oil production will pay a total 49 percent of revenue under the new scheme, up 5 percentage points, while provincial royalties and taxes from natural gas will rise to 60 percent of revenue from 58 percent.

The new royalty plan is less onerous than one proposed last month by a government-appointed review panel. That plan called for even higher taxes on oil sands projects and conventional production.

However, the panel noted that even its higher tax and royalty plan would have placed Alberta's take from the industry below several U.S. oil-producing states, or countries like Norway, Venezuela and Angola, though the industry has disputed some of those figures.

And with the province's oil sands containing some 174 billion barrels of oil, the biggest untapped reserve outside the Middle East, analysts said the changes are unlikely to deter investments by big oil companies.

"Canada has got the resources, certainly on the oil sands, that the big international players are interested in" said Derek Butter, head of corporate analysis at Wood Mackenzie in Edinburgh. "It remains an attractive place to do business and the government's modifications have taken away the negative aspects of the panel's recommendation."

Still, according to Tristone Capital, a Calgary investment firm, the Alberta changes to royalties for conventional oil and gas producers make the economics of drilling in the neighboring provinces of British Columbia and Saskatchewan more attractive and could spark a flight of capital to those regions.

CASH ON THE TABLE

But Alberta isn't the only Canadian province that's moved to squeeze more cash out of the oil industry. Earlier this year Newfoundland, under firebrand Premier Danny Williams, drafted plans to take a 10 percent stake in new energy projects tapping the province's offshore fields, and a boost to its royalties that would increase with oil prices.

The Atlantic province's moves to raise its take from high oil prices was bitterly opposed by oil producers. Chevron Corp (CVX.N: Quote, Profile, Research) walked away last year from negotiations to develop a big field until agreeing in August to sell Newfoundland a 4.9 percent stake.

To be sure, the province will pay for its stake in oil and gas developments, a move that some say makes its changes much different from the tax hikes planned by Alberta.

"Danny Williams put money on the table," said Will Lacey, an analyst at FirstEnergy Capital Corp. "Danny Williams put capital up front... He did change the royalties but at the end of the day he's also an investor."

($1=$0.96 Canadian)

 

 

Scott Haggett is a Reuters reporter. This story was writen from CALGARY, Alberta, on Oct 26 for Reuters. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note: This commentary was originally published by Reuters, on October 26, 2007. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.

All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated

Petroleumworld News 10/29/07

Copyright© 2007 Scott Haggett. All rights reserved.

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels


TOP

Contact:editor@petroleumworld.com/phones:(58 412) 996 3730 or 952 5301
www.petroleumworld.com-Editor:Elio Ohep /
Publisher-Producer:Elio Ohep.
Contact Email:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Legal
Information. CopyRight © 1999-2006, Elio Ohep.- All rights reserved

Fair use notice of copyrighted material:
This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.