Lagniappe

 

 

Allan Wall: Pemex, must be modernized

Pemex, Mexico’s Oil & Gas Monopoly, Must be Modernized

What is PEMEX, and where is it going?

PEMEX (Petróleos Mexicanos) is Mexico’s state oil monopoly. PEMEX is protected from competition in Mexico, where it enjoys a legal monopoly on the exploration, processing and sale of petroleum. Its privileged status in national mythology affords it a certain immunity from criticism.

Nevertheless, PEMEX is in deep trouble. It's heavily indebted and unable to provide the capital necessary to locate and exploit new oil deposits. The Canterell Field, Mexico’s biggest, peaked in 2004, and according to President Felipe Calderon, Mexico only has proven reserves for another nine years. There’s a lot more oil out there, but PEMEX lacks the funds and expertise to get it.

This wasn't the future envisioned by President Lazaro Cardenas, who expelled the foreign oil companies and founded PEMEX in 1938, to give Mexico's oil to "the people." (March 18th, the date of the Expropriación Petrolera – Petroleum Expropriation – is commemorated annually.)

The Mexican Constitution (Article 27) guarantees PEMEX's privileged position, a monopoly over the oil industry, from exploration to the sale of gasoline at the pump.

PEMEX service stations, with their familiar green signs, dispense gasoline nationwide to the captive Mexican consumer. Sometimes the fuel is watered down, but hey, it belongs “to the nation”!

Even Cuba allows foreign companies to exploit offshore oil. PEMEX does subcontract out some work to private (even foreign) companies, but that isn't solving its undercapitalization problem.

The principal contradiction for PEMEX is having to function as both an oil company and a government bureaucracy.

PEMEX is utilized as a golden goose by the government, which siphons off most of its profits to the general budget. This takes away funds that could be used for oil exploration, exploitation and processing. Only about 20% of Mexico's territory has been properly surveyed for petroleum deposits.

Then there is the acute lack of refineries. The United States has 149 operable oil refineries. Mexico, with about a third of U.S. production, has only six!

PEMEX is prohibited from partnering with foreign companies within Mexico, but not abroad. So Mexican crude is shipped to Houston, Texas, where it is refined (in partnership with Shell) and then re-imported to Mexico. Is that bizarre or what?

And since its vast natural gas fields can't be properly exploited, Mexico is a net importer of natural gas from the United States.

Ironically, socialized petroleum makes Mexico more dependent – not less – on the United States.

Mexican pundit Sergio Sarmiento is not a big fan of Mexico’s oil monopoly, which he describes thusly: "… PEMEX … supposedly the property of all Mexicans … has only served to benefit the government, the political elite and the petroleum [workers’] union."

Nevertheless, reforming PEMEX is very difficult.

Article 27 of the Constitution proclaims that all Mexican natural resources are the property of the nation (which in the real world means the property of the government!).

However, the article makes a distinction between petroleum and mineral resources such as silver (of which Mexico is the world’s #1 producer), gold, lead, zinc, iron, etc.

Foreign investment is permitted in the mining industry, in fact foreign companies are actually able to buy and sell concessions to mining operations. But not in petroleum.

It’s easy to change the Mexican Constitution though, if the political will exists. It’s been amended almost 500 times since 1917. As the recent electoral reform indicates, the Constitution can be changed rather quickly if all the party bosses are on the same sheet of music.

The real barrier is psychological, not constitutional. Mexican politicians have been raised on the rhetoric of oil as property of the nation. Just mentioning privatization or even private investment elicits hysteria. Witness, for example, the rhetoric of 2006’s losing presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who isn’t sharing concrete proposals to help PEMEX, but would gladly scuttle any sort of reform that would save it.

Nevertheless, it’s become obvious that something must be done, and the Calderon administration is working to achieve some sort of reform. A full-fledged privatization is not in the works, and there’s practically no demand for it. But if Mexico wants its government to maintain control over its oil industry while simultaneously allowing more foreign investment, there ought to be a way to do that, as other countries have.

Hopefully this year will see some kind of substantive reform that can reform PEMEX, for the good of Mexico and its economic development. Otherwise the company is headed down the tubes.

 

 

Allan Wall, is a MexiData.info columnist, recently returned from a tour of duty in Iraq. He currently resides in Mexico, where he has lived since 1991.Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note: This commentary was originally published by MexiData.info, on 02/25/2007. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.

Editor's Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com. By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish your comments on our letters page.

Petroleumworld News 02/27/08

Copyright© 2008 Allan Wall. All rights reserved.

 

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels