Lagniappe
Eric
Le Boucher :
Triple
shock to the global economy
You've entered the kingdom of uncertainties. Oil? How high
will it go? The dollar? How far will it drop? The financial crisis?
When will it end? Recession? In the United States? In France?
From week to week, the prognosis for each of these questions
eludes us. A dark crisis mechanism is at work that seems impossible
to arrest.
We're suffering the blows of a great triple shock, the scope
and the consequences of which are still difficult to measure,
but which we know will profoundly refashion the global system.
The first shock is the world's shift from the West to the East.
The unique American engine is exhausted, China, Asia are taking
over. The second shock is a consequence of the first: Chinese
thirst for raw materials has caused prices to explode and provoked
a return of inflation - dead for 30 years - to the forefront
of concern. The third shock is the financial crisis which persists,
expands and leads to the end of (too-) easy credit.
There is no equivalent for the first shock unless
it be the passage of supremacy from Europe to America during
the First
World War. The second is like the so-called "oil" shock
of the 1970s. For the final shock, comparison oscillates among
the Great Depression of the 1930s and the more limited crises
of the 19th century and those more recent crises of the 1980s.
The three shocks together have, in any case, an unprecedented
scope: boom, boom, boom, they come at once and act in concert.
The Federal Reserve is blamed for having been
the source of the evils of easy money. The "wizard" Alan
Greenspan, adulated only yesterday, decided on interest rates
too low to
encourage growth, but that inflated asset bubbles instead. American
households were able to go into debt cheaply and consume more
and more. Imports grew in a straight line; the trade deficit
deepened; the dollar began to weaken.
The United States has other, enviable, "fundamentals:" productivity
gains, a high-tech sector, immigration ... but its debt-fueled
growth model spiraled out of control with respect to real estate.
The house was barely purchased before it gained in value, which
allowed it to be refinanced and borrowing to be increased. Lending
organizations invented subprimes to convince households without
the means that they, too, could become property-owners under
this system. Up until the day when, after an increase of 80%
between 2000 and 2006, prices stagnated, forcing those households
into bankruptcy.
The subprime crisis is one of excessive indebtedness. The American growth model
will have to change: the return to savings will atrophy consumption; the
dollar's fall could allow exports to take up a part of the slack. How? To
what extent? It's too early to know.
In any case, the American deficit has its complement:
the Asian surplus. China became the United States's workshop,
then, as
it accumulated monetary reserves, its creditor. The size of developing
economies has grown vertiginously: they account for 50% of global
GNP (in purchasing power parity). The "dragon" swallows
half of global pork production, ditto for cement, a third of
steel production. Its oil consumption will triple between now
and 2030. Hence the surge in energy, metal and food prices.
From now on, food and energy will be more expensive. We are
experiencing the end of a 30-year downward trend in commodity
prices. Does that mean the resurgence of the specter of inflation?
Probably not, even if it is too soon to be entirely reassured.
In the immediate future, these elevated prices are going to corrode
purchasing power, slowing both consumption and growth.
To what extent are developing countries autonomous
enough to resist the fall of the American economy, now poised
on the verge
of recession? This East versus West "uncoupling" is
one major uncertainty.
Then, there's the financial crisis. The collapse
of an investment fund in the American giant Carlyle Group,
this week, has come
to show that that crisis is far from being contained. What's
new about this crisis is that it does not center on one country
or one bank, but concerns the sui generis construction of the
financial world. Did the Fed's too-low interest rates or the
excessive ingenuity of the math geniuses bring it about? In any
case, the banks, and especially other financial organizations
have sold and resold fragile stacks of "products," in
ignorance of their risks. The regulations that forced these products
off-balance sheet were an incentive to crime, while the obligation
to mark to market daily has precipitated losses. In short, the
hyper-finance world offers a great many subjects for revision,
and, in the meantime, fear of new losses, failures and credit
rationing after years of excess is strong.
The three shocks create uncertainty in the short term. Over
the longer term, they will prove not to have been solely negative,
and should give birth to a new economy with multi-polar growth,
strong research and development in energy and agriculture, wiser
finance. But the process of giving birth is always agonizing.
Eric
Le Boucher is international
Editor and Economic Columnist, in Le Monde. Petroleumworld
does not necessarily share these views
Editor's
Note: This commentary was originally published by Le Monde,
March 15, 2008. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the
interest of our readers.
Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our
readers.
All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not
reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment
as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are
private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this
website. All comments are posted and published without liability
to Petroleumworld.
Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and
humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator
of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by
the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or
broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction
identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or
else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair
use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments:
editor@petroleumworld.com. By using this link, you agree to
allow E&P to publish your
comments on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 03/27/08
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news
agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone
provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other
stories you have to get authorization by its authors.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels
