Lagniappe
Global
Insight: Oil
prices rise
as
Saudi comments over output fail to reassure
Oil prices have again risen, appearing to have largely
ignored the energy summit this weekend in Jeddah, Saudi
Arabia.
Global Insight Perspective
Significance The energy summit in the Saudi capital, Jeddah,
this weekend has apparently failed to assuage both market
concerns over supplies and political concerns over prices.
Implications Unfortunately, the most positive impact of
the meeting was the kingdom's half-hearted commitment to
long-term capacity expansions. These plans will have no
bearing on near-term oil-price movements.
Outlook Oil prices will continue to take guidance from
short-term factors, though Global Insight expects a correction
to take place as future demand growth falters and a spare
capacity cushion grows in Saudi Arabia.
Assurances
by OPEC kingpin Saudi Arabia that it would respond to
market tightness by boosting production as and
when needed appear to have been overshadowed by news over
the weekend of further production problems in Nigeria.
Despite having fallen to as low as US$131.75/b, the NYMEX
August crude futures contract went on close at US$135.36/b—up
US$2.76 on the day. In London, the ICE Brent oil contract
for August delivery also jumped, closing at US$135.40/b—up
US$2.71/b.
The
upward shift in prices appears partly driven by events
in Nigeria over the last few days, with reports of Chevron
declaring force majeure on around 120,000 b/d of output
as a result of sabotage against an oil pipeline. The supermajor
has also been facing a labour dispute that is threatening
to affect the company's entire 350,000 b/d of output in
Nigeria. Furthermore, an attack by oil militants on Shell's
Bonga oilfield facilities last week resulted in the company
being forced to shut in around 225,000 b/d of output. In
a sign of how dire the situation has become, a senior Nigerian
official has commented that the country's total oil production
is now running at between 1.2 million b/d and 1.5 million
b/d—a 25-year low.
Jeddah Summit Short-Term Disappointment
The summit in Jeddah between oil producers, consumers,
and high-level representatives of the oil industry initially
seems to have received a cool reaction from the world
crude markets. While Saudi back-channel diplomacy had
managed to raise expectations of the meeting's ability
to deliver on a concerted international effort to bring
down spiralling crude prices and rein in market volatility,
only Saudi Arabia itself produced any concrete offer
of added production capacity. Indeed, some OPEC nations
even threatened to withdraw production, viewing the Saudi
offer as stoking a possible over-supply of the market.
Saudi
Arabia confirmed its latest pledged 200,000-b/d production
increase from July, while Kuwait and the United
Arab Emirates reiterated their abilities to raise production "should
they be called upon by the market to do so", Agence
France-Presse (AFP) reported. The biggest news was the
Saudi revival of its long-term commitment to raise output
capacity by an additional 2.5 million b/d, from 12.5 million
b/d to 15 million b/d by 2018, an investment programme
that had been scrapped in recent months. Saudi Arabia is
currently finalising a programme to increase its production
capacity from an official 11.3 million b/d to 12.5 million
b/d by mid-2009. The added capacity in the second-stage
extension programme would be sourced almost entirely from
five specific fields: Zuluf (900,000 b/d); Safaniyah (700,000
b/d); Berri (300,000 b/d); Khurais (300,000 b/d); and Shaybah
(250,000 b/d). The second-stage increase was earlier put
on ice, as the kingdom said it did not see world demand
climbing to such levels in that amount of time. Launching
the second-phase production capacity extension would, however,
still be subject to studies on whether future oil demand
would warrant the huge investments, Saudi Oil Minister
Ali al-Nuaimi told media, indicating several times that
a full commitment by the kingdom to pursue the long-term
programme was still lacking.
Doubts with Producers Continue
Further near-term production increases by Kuwait and the
United Arab Emirates were also cast in doubt, as national
oil industry insiders quoted by AFP said the de facto
spare capacity of United Arab Emirates' main producer,
Abu Dhabi, currently only stood at around 150,000 b/d.
They also said that Kuwait only could sustain an added
production of 100,000 b/d during a shorter term. Both
the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, together with Saudi
Arabia, are currently suffering a gas crunch, which—to
compound global fears of crude market tightness—has
forced the countries to increase their use of crude for
electricity generation, as well as occasionally divert
gas from crude production-supporting gas-injection programmes
to electricity plants, hurting oil output. As the summer
peak-demand period is intensifying in the region, this
might cause further production instability.
OPEC Disunity
After having threatened to snub the meeting, Venezuela
did in the end attend the high-profile summit, sending
Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez to Jeddah. The volte-face
indicates how strongly Saudi Arabia wanted the summit
to convey unity on the OPEC oil-producer side and was
most likely a result of strong back-channel negotiations
between the countries. Nevertheless, OPEC continued to
send out contradicting signals during and after the meeting,
and ultimately the summit did not achieve the Saudi goal
of a new OPEC consensus about the need to add production
in order to lower prices. Algeria's Energy Minister,
and OPEC's current chairman, Chakib Khelil, continued
to affirm that global supply and demand are in balance
and that speculation and a falling U.S. dollar were at
the root of the price increase, with Libya's Oil Minister
Shukri Ghanem going as far as saying that Libya—seeing
no market need to add production—might consider
lowering production by a corresponding amount to the
Saudi increase, in order to keep the supply-demand balance
intact, Bloomberg reported. Khelil went as far as telling
AFP that he could not see prices recede because of the
conference, while talks were in full swing yesterday,
undermining the Saudi efforts to reassure the markets.
Long-Term Efforts, with Uncertain Impact
The resulting final declaration agreed upon by the converging
consumer, producer, and industry representatives showed
an attempt to co-ordinate international co-operation
over the high oil prices, but has generally been received
as lacking in concrete measures. A concerted view over
market speculation being culpable for the spiralling
prices failed to emerge, although a need to "study" the
role of the futures market's impact on fundamental prices
was agreed between the parties, as well as a call for
greater regulation and transparency in the activities
of index funds on the commodity markets.
Outlook and Implications
The absence of very concrete suggestions and policies emanating
from the Jeddah meeting is likely to result in market
disappointment in the short term. Saudi Arabia has failed
to address the most critical issues levied against the
OPEC oil producers: the lack of reserve data transparency
and the lack of disclosure of how much non-heavy-oil
added production capacity they actually have. With most
of the OPEC spare capacity now being made up of heavy
oil, with which the world market appears saturated, the
perceived market tightness looks set to continue for
some time, unless the now-promised added flows of light
and medium crude from the Khursaniyah field in July on
their own manage to make the necessary impact. Saudi
Arabia is the only country within OPEC that has the ability
to bring any substantial additional volumes to market,
with an implied spare capacity cushion of around 1.5
million b/d. Nonetheless, the kingdom's output expansions
are years away.
One
of the popular reasons given for the 40% jump in oil
prices this year has been the continued strong growth
of
Asian economies such as China and India, but that growth
has partly been sustained by a policy of subsiding fuel
prices and so shielding consumers from paying full global
market rates. The oil-price jump has been so pronounced,
however, that even these economies are being forced to
cut subsidies as their budgetary costs become unbearable
amid fears of inflation. As a result, several Asian governments,
including—surprisingly—China, have decided
to raise fuel prices in order to rein in the otherwise
spiralling costs of keeping the policy in play. As such,
demand growth from the region is expected to fall in future.
The medium-term outlook therefore appears to be more bearish,
amid warnings of falling fuel consumption even in the United
States, the world's largest economy.
As
is evident from the recent direction of oil prices, however,
the market appears to be focusing its attentions
on short-term factors, and in this regard, disruptions
to supply are particularly relevant given the recent negative
oil production news from Nigeria. This, along with continued
sabre-rattling by Israel towards Iran, seems to be contributing
to the particularly bullish sentiment at play this morning.
At the time of writing, the front-month NYMEX futures contract
was trading higher at US$137.19/b—up 1.35%.
Samuel
Ciszuk & Lawrence Poole are
a Global Insight's Middle East Energy analysts. Petroleumworld
does not necessarily share these view.
Editor's
Note: Editor's Note: For more information on Global Insigth,
contact: Catarina Feria-Walsh Global Insight, catarina.walsh@globalinsight.com.
www.globalinsight.com.
All
comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do
not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in
the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All
comments expressed are private comments and do not
necessary
reflect the view of this website. All comments are
posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner. We are making such material available
in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of
environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is
Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld
encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast
Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction
identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com
or else and it is done within the fair use as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes
of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld
welcomes your feedback and comments: editor@petroleumworld.com.
By using this link, you agree to allow E&P to publish
your comments on our letters page.
Petroleumworld
News 06/24/08
Copyright© 2008
respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories
by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source.
Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.

Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE
5.01+
Windows
NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels