Oil: what goes down must go up?
About 60 miles west of Cleveland, Cedar Point is world-renowned for its scary roller-coasters. However, Cedar Point has nothing on the oil markets.
At the turn of 2007 / 2008, oil was at the cusp of $100/ barrel -- a price that was considered a kind of mythical barrier, due to its three-digit numerology. Well, it took just a day or two into 2008 to broach that level, and by July, oil was approaching $150/barrel -- an increase of 50% in 6 months, and fully 6 times the levels that prevailed just 5 years previously in 2003.
Then, the bubble burst, violently: in just the six months since the summer, oil prices have collapsed, falling by about 75%, to below $40/barrel.
I am reminded of the classic Vince Lombardi film clip, in which he yells out incredulously from the sideline, "What the hell's going on out here? " People ask me, as if I should know, because I've been involved in the energy industry for over two decades, but alas: I can't figure it out. And, I'm not alone.
For instance, consider the December 10 presentation given by Matt Simmons in Houston. Simmons has impeccable credentials, having served as an analyst of the oil industry for nearly 40 years -- and it seems as though he's incredulous as to what he's seeing.
Simmons laments (like many others of us) that the recent collapse in oil prices -- as inexplicable as it's been -- is not a good thing. For Simmons and others in the oil industry, low oil prices have caused major investment projects to be deferred. For those of us more on the cleantech side of things, low oil prices cause the alternatives to oil to become less economically or financially attractive.
To Simmons, it is especially frustrating that the decline in oil prices have nothing to do with fundamental realities. Simmons notes that plummeting prices haven't been driven by any material declines in global demand, backing this with the comment that "all signs still say [the oil market is] 'very tight'" -- admittedly cryptic, but Simmons has access to all sorts of data from innumerable sources in the oil industry worldwide.
After asking plaintively "why do we know so little about an issue so critical to our well-being?", he pulls no punches with his stark conclusions: "Crude oil has peaked" and "Its future decline could be swift," giving credence to his warning that "What goes down can come right back!"
The logic of his analysis suggests that oil prices cannot sustain for long at $40/ barrel. Simmons has often said that oil at even $150/ barrel is still incredibly cheap -- 22 cents/ cup -- and that Americans really need to get a grip on how valuable the stuff is, and thus how expensive by all rights it really ought to be.
In an October 2008 report entitled "Ratcheting Down: Oil and the Global Credit Crisis" , Cambridge Energy Research Associates recently developed an estimated supply curve for the various sources of oil worldwide , and to achieve production rates at current levels of about 85 million barrels per day, CERA's work indicates that prices of at least $100/ barrel are eminently justifiable.
For you investors out there, all of this is good justification for making a bet on oil prices going up from current levels. Maybe you can make a killing.
At the societal level, though, the implications of peaking oil production are troubling. A really negative take on the prospects is offered by an open letter written by Nate Hagens to President Obama , posted on The Oil Drum , one of the most comprehensive resources concerning peak oil issues on the Web.
As for Simmons, he's less hyperbolic than Mr. Hagens, but not a whole lot more optimistic. He invokes the perspectives of the new leadership at the International Energy Agency -- "Current energy supply trends are patently unsustainable," "Future of human prosperity depends on how we tackle our energy issues", Consequences of policy / investment inaction are shocking", "Massive investment required", and "Time is running out and time to act is NOW!" -- and closes his presentation by declaring that "'Yes We Can' solve this bleak energy future, but we now need to sprint into hasty retreat from our addiction to oil and gas."
How comfortable are you in ignoring such well-substantiated warnings from an oil patch veteran like Simmons?
So, for those of you clamoring for low oil prices, at current levels or even lower, don't bet on it. $40/ barrel is likely to be an aberration.
Richard Stuebi has over 20 years of experience as an executive, entrepreneur and consultant in the energy industry. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
This commentary was originally published by Seeking Alpha on 01/27/2008. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.
Eurasia Group is the world's leading global political risk research and consulting firm
All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website.
All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld. Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 01/28/09
Send this story to a friend
Your feedback is important to us!
Readers' comments: share your thoughts on this article.
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write to firstname.lastname@example.org
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by
anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories
you have to
get authorization by its authors.
By using this link, you agree to allow PW to publish your comments on our letters page.
Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
question or suggestions, please write to:
Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels