World


Bolivia

Peru

Venezuela

Trinidad
&
Caribbean








Very usefull links



Institutional
links



Venezuela
Central Bank
Economic Indicators


Venezuela Energy
& Mines
Ministry

 

 


OPEC





Petroleumworld
Business
Partners
:

 


 





 

 



Centre for
Global Energy
Studies

 

Iran-Watch.com



blogspots

caracas
chronicles


BOOKSTORE

Fundamentos de
la Comercialización
de
los Hidrocarburos


r


By Oren Harris
(Spanish only)

More info


Petróleo Global
y
Estado Naciona
l



By Bernard Mommer
(Spanish only)

More info

 

Glossary of Petroleum
& Environment



English-Spanish/
Spanish-English



 

Lagniappe

 

 

 

Bob Burnett :
Iraq - How Do You Spell LOSER?



It hardly seems necessary to tell the blogsphere that the occupation of Iraq is an unmitigated disaster. For most of us who consider ourselves progressives or independent thinkers, it’s become painfully obvious that whatever it was that America set out to do in Iraq, we have failed. Every day brings fresh evidence that Iraq is descending into chaos: insurgent attacks are at a record high, and there are continuing reports of death squads and US atrocities. The war in Iraq is over. The US lost.

The problem is that too many Americans are unwilling to face the reality that we’ve lost and that our presence is doing more harm than good. The latest Gallup Poll indicates that a strong majority (57 percent) of those polled felt that the US “made a mistake in sending troops to Iraq”. Nonetheless, respondents remained divided about what to do: 36 percent felt we should withdraw “some” troops; 28 percent thought they should all come home; 25 percent believed we should “keep as it is now”; and 8 percent wanted more troops. While a strong majority (57 percent) does not expect the US to win in Iraq, a significant minority (39 percent) believes that we “definitely” or “probably can win.”

The crux of the problem seems to be that two-thirds of Americans do not believe that President Bush has “a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq.” Despite the President’s claim that he sees the light at the end of the tunnel, the public recognizes that Iraq is a mess; the latest evidence being a new government that takes forever to form and then cannot agree on security ministers.

Nonetheless, 69 percent of the Americans polled by Gallup feel that we should keep at least some troops in Iraq for an indefinite period. This is both a political and a psychological position. The political aspect is pretty clear: Iraq is George Bush’s war and the GOP is stuck with it. Repugs may try to divert public attention to immigration or gay marriage, but Iraq remains the dominant issue for most Americans. So the GOP adopts the Administration position, “Iraq is tough going, but a big win is just around the corner.”

For many Americans, the problem is psychological. Citizens don’t believe that Bush has a plan for Iraq; they feel that we went to war for the wrong reasons and have terribly mismanaged the occupation. Nonetheless, they want to see good come of it. They keep hoping that all those live lost, all those terribly injured, and all that money spent was not in vain. It’s very hard for most Americans to face the fact that the occupation has been an absolute disaster.

It’s ironic that Iraq so closely resembles Vietnam, the war that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld struggled so hard to avoid. The parallels are obvious, from the fabricated justification of the war to the vain attempts to form a “democratic” government. And, the end of the occupation of Iraq is looking more and more like the end of the war in Vietnam. May 26th saw the release of more diplomatic papers of Henry Kissinger. These indicated that while Kissinger was Nixon’s Secretary of State, in 1972, he told China that the US could live with a communist takeover in South Vietnam, so long as this happened a decent interval after the withdrawal of US troops. For those of us with long memories, this proves what we’ve long believed. While Richard Nixon was claiming that he saw the light at the end of the tunnel, that we were going to “win” in Vietnam, he was secretly negotiating to “cut and run.”

It’s easy to imagine the Bush Administration scrambling to find a similar accommodation in Iraq. George Bush is certainly cynical enough to declare victory in Iraq when nothing has changed. He’d proclaim that the current Iraqi government is good enough and, therefore, our troops are no longer to ensure internal security and will be withdrawn to our “enduring” bases. He’d follow this by bringing some of the troops home.

Of course, the parallels with Vietnam would stop with a phony declaration of victory. The US completely withdrew from Vietnam; we plan to stay in our bases. There was a dreadful purge in South Vietnam, but nothing like the ethnic cleansing that we’d expect in a “new” Iraq. And, at the end of the Vietnamese war, no one expected the Vietnamese to disrupt the entirety of South East Asia, although they did invade Cambodia. The insurgency in Iraq is a danger to disrupt all the countries around it.

George Bush doesn’t read history, so he never absorbed the lessons learned from Vietnam. (In fact, he said that we should have stayed the course.) But we should expect that someone in the Administration digested the history of the Vietnamese War. If they had, the White House would recognize that their mistakes have driven the US into a corner in Iraq, the same no-win zone that America sank into in Vietnam. We’ve blundered into a moral cul-de-sac, where all the road signs say the same thing, “Loser.

 

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer and Quaker actvist. He is particularly interested in progressive morality and writes frequently on the ethical aspects of political and social issues. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note: This commentary was originally published opednews.com, Oct 06, 2006. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.

All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld Editorial articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.

Petroleumworld News 10/09/06

Copyright©2006 Bob Burnett . All rights reserved.

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com


Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels

 

 

Contact: editor@petroleumworld.com/phone:(58 412) 996 3730 or 952 5301
Editor:Elio C. Ohep A/Producer - Publisher:Elio Ohep /
Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com
CopyRight © 1999-2006, Elio Ohep - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information
Tele
phone: 58 412 996 3730

 

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.