Lagniappe
Scott
Sullivan:
Prime Minister Maliki confronts Bush
The
game is over. US policy in Iraq, which boosted Iran in Iraq and the
Middle East, has just collapsed, brought down by patriotic Iraqis who
refused to play the role of Quislings for Iran.
The collapse of
US policy was in full view today as Iraqi Prime minister
Nouri al-Maliki refused to accept a US-imposed timetable for government
reform, and refused to approve a US attack on Sadr City, Muqtada al-Sadr's
base of operations next to Baghdad.
Before going further,
let US review Ambassador Khalilzad's strategy for
assisting Iran. His first step was to select SCIRI leader Abdul Azziz
al-Hakim as his primary partner in Iraqi politics. In reality, although
Hakim represented only a minority of Iraqis including those who are
Iraqi
Shia, he did have the full support of Tehran.
Khalilzad's second
step was to ignore the SCIRI's Badr Brigades, in reality
pro-Iran death squads that were organized, financed, trained and equipped
by
Tehran, as they infiltrated the command structures of the new Iraqi
army
and police forces. From this favored position, Iran was able to wage
war on
its Iraqi rivals, especially the Mahdi Army of Muqtada al-Sadr, which
represented the pro-Iraq Shia and was therefore excluded from the high
command of the new Iraqi security forces.
In short, Ambassador
Khalilzad was creating a Shia "state within a state"
that at the appropriate moment would assert Iran's interests in Iraq.
Khalilzad's third
step was to promote an Iraqi constitution that, via
support for provincial autonomy, would pave the way for Iranian annexation
of southeastern Iraq including Basra. Such an annexation, in conjunction
with the emergence of Iraqi Kurdistan, also supported by Iran, would
disintegrate the Iraqi state, turn Iran into the superpower of the Middle
East, and ignite civil war between the Kurds and the Sunnis, to the
great
benefit of Iran..
Khalilzad's fourth
step was to confront directly Muqtada al-Sadr and the
Mahdi Army. US forces took the lead. Muqtada al-Sadr, with his forthright
opposition to provincial autonomy, his formidable political base in
Basra
and throughout southern Iraq, along with his persistent efforts to assemble
an anti-Iran United Front, posed a mortal threat to Iran.
Iran's next step
was to attempt a coup in Basra two weeks ago to prepare the
way for Iran's direct annexation of southeastern Iraq, now facilitated
by
legislation approved by the Iraqi parliament that was sponsored by Abdul
Azziz al-Hakim and the SCIRI party. Iran's coup attempt in Basra failed,
and was followed by Muqtada al-Sadr's pre-emptive strikes against the
Badr
Brigades in Aramah. Bt this time, Prime Minister Maliki essentially
sided
with Muqtada al-Sadr.
At this point, Khalilzad
too escalated and began calling for the immediate
liquidation of the Mahdi Army. While obscuring his own pro-Iran stance
and
his support for Iraq's partition, Khalilzad kept the focus on Muqtada
al-Sadr, and by implication Prime Minister Maliki, as the primary threat
faced by Iraq.
Ambassador Khalilzad
is now in a highly delicate and vulnerable position.
If Khalilzad continues to escalate against Sadr and Maliki he could
bring
down the Iraqi government. Yet if Khalilzad pulls back, Sadr and Maliki
will continue to win. The fate of Iraq, Iran and perhaps the entire
Middle
East is now in play.
Scott Sullivan
is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld not necessarily
share these views.
Editor's
Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect
either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement
of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do
not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted
and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Fair
use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All
works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld
endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons
to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided
that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com
or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material
from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet
web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld
News 10/26/06
Copyright©2006
Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.