Lagniappe

 

 

Scott Sullivan:
Bush-Ahmadinejad-Chavez axis emerges

President Bush has a dream. Just as Richard Nixon realigned global politics
by going to Beijing, President Bush will do the same by going to Tehran and
Caracas. In Bush's vision, he is the only one who can cut a deal and assert
US interests with Ahmadinejad and Chavez, just as Nixon asserted US
interests with China. In one dramatic move, or so he fantasizes, Bush will
be magically transformed from a loser to a man of destiny.

This Bush orientation to Iran and Venezuela is evident by Bush's deliberate
sabotage of Republican fortunes in the mid-term elections that brought the
Democratic Party to power in the House and Senate. A Republican Congress
would have resisted Bush overtures to Ahmadinejad and Chavez. Bush hopes a
Democratic Congress will be more pliable.

This shift in US orientation to Ahmadinejad and Chavez is also evident by
Bush's dismissal of Rumsfeld as SECDEF, including the timing of his
dismissal. Rumsfeld had to go because, as a protégé and admirer of Richard
Nixon, he would have regarded such a Bush outreach to Tehran and Caracas as
a mistake.

Moreover, Rumsfeld had considerable DoD intelligence assets with which to
oppose an appeasement policy. Bush's nightmare was that Rumsfeld would
join up with a Republican Congress to oppose an appeasement policy. As a
result, Rumsfeld was dismissed and replaced by the ever more pliable Robert
Gates, who would bring DoD's intelligence assets under CIA control.

President Bush also timed Rumsfeld's dismissal in a way that did the maximum
damage to continued Republican control of Congress. If Bush had announced
Rumsfeld's dismissal last month, he could have neutralized the Iraq issue in
the elections, thus salvaging Republican control of Congress.

In this sense, the Democratic Party owes President Bush a huge vote of
thanks. It can be said that Bush and the Democrats are now thrown together
in partnership, due to Bush's strategy on Rumsfeld. Bush will draw upon
this partnership to gain congressional approval for diplomatic openings to
Ahmadinejad, Chavez, and their allies.

Let's begin with Nicaragua and Bolivia. In Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega has
just returned to power after thirteen years in the political wilderness. In
Bolivia, Hugo Chavez has convinced Evo Morales to confront Brazil by
permitting Venezuela to build several military bases on Bolivian territory.
These two highly provocative moves should draw a strong US response.
Instead, President Bush, backed by his new Democratic Congress, will appease
Ortega, Morales, and Chavez. As a result, Bush has decisively affirmed the
Bush-Ahmadinejad-Chavez Axis, while Brazil, not the US, will have to
scramble to find a way to contain the Chavez threat while Bush improves
relations with Chavez.

Just as President Bush will reach out to Chavez, he will reach out to
Ahmadinejad. Thus, Bush appoints Robert Gates as Rumsfeld's successor.
Most observers believe the appointment of Robert Gates will lead to major
changes in US policy on Iraq. In truth, only one major change will emerge.
The US policy of covert support for Iran in Iraq and the region will be
elevated to a policy of overt support for Iran.

To this end, the US will take even a softer line on Iran's nuclear weapons
program; i.e. the US will issue fewer empty threats against Iran to employ
sanctions to deter Iranian nukes. In Iraq, the US will ramp up cooperation
with Iran using the pretext of planning for the withdrawal of US troops. As
US troops are withdrawn or redeployed to Baghdad, the US will transfer
political power in strategic cities like Basra to Iran and its local allies
(e.g., SCIRI and the Badr Brigades).

Moreover, the US will join Iran in pressing Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki to suppress Muqtada al-Sadr and the Mahdi Army. In line with his
policy, the US will redeploy its troops to Baghdad for a final showdown with
Muqtada al-Sadr, while Iran stays safely on the sidelines.

Lastly, the US, along with Iran, will continue to push for the breakup of
Iraq into three ethnic states. Once this breakup occurs, and Iran is able
to annex southern Iraq and Basra, Iran is convinced it will become the
superpower of the Middle East, the Persian Gulf, and eventually Central
Asia.

Robert Gates is the pivotal figure in President Bush's outreach to
Ahmadinejad and Chavez. Gates has even provided a handy roadmap for a break
though in US-Iran relations in a 2004 report for the Council for Foreign
Relations (see "Robert Gates, the anti-Rumsfeld," IHT, 9 November 2006).

In short, for President Bush to achieve his breakthrough with Ahmadinejad
and Chavez, Secretary Rumsfeld and the Republican Congress had to go. Now,
how far will the Democratic Congress go to support Bush's appeasement plan?

 

Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.

Petroleumworld News 11/10/06

Copyright©2006 Scott Sullivan. All rights reserved.

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels