|

World
Brazil
Mexico
Bolivia
Peru
Trinidad &
Tobago
Venezuela








Petroleumworld
Bookstore

Institutional
links

OPEC


Petroleumworld
Business Partners

IRAQ OIL THE FORUM
Blogspots
recomended
caracas chronicles
Iran Watch.org
Venezuela Today
Le Blog des
Energies Nouvelles
|
|
Editorial / Commentary / Opinion
Gustavo Coronel : Chevron in Ecuador:
recent twists and turns
The legal action against Chevron in Ecuador: recent twists and turns.
This legal action has a special interest due to several reasons: (1), it has been initiated by a group of Ecuadorian citizens with the support of U.S. lawyers and of an organization. Amazon Coalition, that blends environmental concerns with a strong anti-capitalist, ideological posture; (2), The size of the damages requested, $26 billion; (3), Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa has openly spoken against the oil company and has leaned on the judge so that he decides against Chevron; (4), The previous judge had to withdraw from the case after videos revealed that he was in conversations with the plaintiffs and seemed to have accepted a bribe to decide against Chevron; (5), the expert named by the judge to analyze the environmental situation in the area and to estimate the amount of damages does not have the proper credentials for the job and has been accused by the defendant to have had links to the plaintiffs; (6), The environmental damages claimed by the plaintiffs took place more than 20 years ago and, since then, the Ecuadorian state-owned oil company has been operating in the same area. However, this company has not been mentioned in the legal action, which is hard to understand; (7), both the legal and the conceptual irregularities related to the trial are so numerous that it should have been cancelled long ago.
A few days ago a New York judge discarded the claim by the government of Ecuador that Chevron had no right to ask for arbitration about who is responsible for the environmental damages that might have taken place in the region of Ecuador where Texaco (Chevron) and PetroEcuador, the state oil company were active in the past. This arbitration is based on the claim by Chevron that PetroEcuador is the main responsible party for whatever environmental damage might exist in the region. It is also based on the claim by Chevron that the government of Ecuador is interfering illegally in the trial. Manhattan Judge Leonard B. Sand agreed that the government of Ecuador had been interfering in the normal process of the trial and has rejected the request by this government to stop the arbitration asked for by Chevron.
C. MacNeil Mitchell, a lawyer for Ecuador, said the republic is considering whether to appeal the decision. Kent Robertson, a Chevron spokesman, said the judge's ruling was an important development in its efforts to pursue arbitration. The arbitration panel "is one of the few bodies that can compel Ecuador to do the right thing and clean up the Amazon," Mr. Robertson said. "With today's decision, we are one step closer to making that a reality."
Gustavo Coronel is a 28 years oil industry veteran, a member of the first board of directors (1975-1979) of Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), author of several books. At the present Coronel is Petroleumworld associate editor and advisor on the opinion and editorial content of the site. All his articles can be read in Gustavo's blog. Lass Armas de Coronel . Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld,
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments,
share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to editor@petroleumworld.com
Petroleumworld News 03/16/2010
Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source.Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors
Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x600 pixels
|
|