World

 

Brazil

Mexico

Bolivia

Peru

Trinidad &
Tobago

Venezuela








Very usefull links



Petroleumworld
Bookstore



Institutional
links


OPEC



 


Petroleumworld
Business Partners

 


IRAQ OIL THE FORUM


Blogspots
recomended

caracas chronicles

Gustavo Coronel

Iran Watch.org

Venezuela Today

Le Blog des
Energies Nouvelles

 

 

Editorial / Commentary / Opinion

 

 

 

Scott Sullivan :
Karzai must learn from Cambodia




President Obama has dismissed GEN McChrystal as the commander of US forces in Afghanistan. Good. Obama should now reject GEN McChrytal's strategy plan for Afghanistan. McChrystal's plan is flawed because it identifies Taliban and al Qaeda as the US's main enemy in Afghanistan; instead of Iran and Pakistan. Moreover, because McChrystal cannot accurately identify the main enemy, he cannot identify a US path to victory in Afghanistan. In my view, a path to victory can best be found in Afghanistan by imitating Cambodia's strategy of a national liberation war that brought Cambodia to victory over Vietnam. Below you will find an assessment of the flaws in McChrystal's strategy plan for Afghanistan, as well as a description of Canmbidia's national liberation strategy that would produce victory in Afghanistan.

First, as noted earlier, McChrystal praises Pakistan as a valuable ally, when, in truth, Pakistan is a primary US adversary. McChrystal praises Pakistan for allowing US forces to use Pakistani territory as the main supply route for supporting US military operations in Afghanistan. Yet, McChrystal ignores Pakistan's increasing alignment with Iran as a strategic partner, even as Iran pays its own Taliban factions to destroy US logistics with IED's and military attacks on US convoys in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Second, McChrystal's ignores the adverse impact on US policy of Pakistan's loss of China as a strategic partner. In recent months China has reoriented its policy in South Asia in favor of Afghanistan and against Pakistan, as evidenced by the recent Afghanistan-China agreement that Chinese peacekeepers ( not Palistani!) will replace US forces as they are withdrawn from Afghanistan. The loss of China as Pakistan's main ally would significantly increase Pakistani dependence on Iran and the US. In short, Iran is becoming a main beneficiary of Obama's new policies as China abandons Pakistan.

Third, McChrystals planning paper on Afghanistan makes no effort to prdict, or even better, facilitate the arrival in of large scale diplomatic and military forces from communist China, which is aligned with Afghanistan,  and fron Communist Russia, which is aligned with Syria.

What scenario do we want in Afghanistan?  The answer is simple.  We want a Cambodia 1980's scenario in Afghanistan, when Cambodian nationalist insurgents known as the Khmer Rouge crushed Vietnam's invading forces in a five year war of liberation led  by Pol Pot, China, North Korea and Thailand.

This Vietnam scenario serves as an effective model for Afghanistan because each of today's Afghanistan's leaders is able to select a key role for themselves, from Vietnam's model, in today's Afghan anti-imperialist struggle -- Thus, Karzai would become Prince Sihanouk, Mullah Omar is Khieu Samphan, and Osama bin Laden is Pol Pot. Afghanistan, of course, would be 1980's Cambodia. Meanwhile, Pakistan and Iran will take Vietnam's role as an aggressor state.

Afghanistan's nationalists should welcome the concept of looking to Cambodia for inspiration in developing a war of Afghan liberation against its own foreign adversaries. We know that Prince Sihanouk and the Kher Rouge defeated Vietnam, even though at that time, Vietnam was seen as invincable, especially at the hands  of a Third World partisan  force such as the Khmer Rouge.  But, if the KR can prevail over Vietnam, so can the Taliban and al-Qaeda prevail over Pakistan and Iran.  As the Black Panthers used to say in the 1970's  --  Dare to struggle, dare to win!



 

 

Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee and was the Senior Advisor for International Economics at the Crisis Management Center of the National Security Council, 1984 - 1986. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note:All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld,

Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated

Petroleumworld News 06/25/2010


Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback
and comments, share your thoughts on this article,
your feedback is important to us!


We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source.Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors

Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x
600 pixels

 


TOP


Editor:Elio Ohep /
Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com

Contact:
editor@petroleumworld.com/ phone: Office (58 212) 635 7252,
or Cel (58 412) 996 3730 or
(58  412) 952 5301


CopyRight © 1999-2010, Elio Ohep - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

- CCS Office Tele
phone/Teléfonos Oficina: (58 212) 635 7252

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites


Technorati Profile

Fair use notice of copyrighted material:

Legal Information

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.