Scott Sullivan :
Loughner is an anti-war leftist
The vast majority of Democrats agree that Jarad Lee Loughner is a right wing extremist, another Timothy McVeigh. Wrong! A story in today's Washington Post about Loughner reveals that Loughner is an anti-war leftist and that his purpose in life is to stop the war in Afghanistan (a war which Rep. Giffords reluctantly supports). To quote Loughner on the effects of theAfghan war on US society, “We're examining the torture of students …. The war that we are in right now is currently illegal under the Constitution. What makes it illegal is the currency.”
In other words, Louchner asserts that the Bush-Obama war in Afghanistan has become so unpopular that Obama cannot obtain sufficient funding from Congress. Obama is therefore funding the Afghan war through “illegal means” by using the Federal Reserve as a source of funding by expanding the money supply, a step that creates inflation and wrecks the economy.
Meanwhile, US students worry about fighting in n illegal and deeply unpopular war in Afghanisan. Also, US students worry they are being robbed of their future prosperity as Obama debases the US currency.
Moreover, the students are aware Bush-Obama war on Afghanistan is a bad idea for many national security reasons. For example, VP Biden during his recent visit asked Pakistan to impose a settlement , while ignoring Afghan desires as well as the desires of their neighbors to keep Afghan borders intact. Pakistan, of course, will do just the opposite as part of its imposed settlement by annexing 25-30 percent of Afghanistan's territory, a move that will infuriate Afghanistan's two closest allies – Russia and India – and could precipitate war between Pakistan and India.
Furthermore, US military deployments to Pakistan are foolhardy because such deployments could lead to US confrontations with Chinese troops in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in the absence of a coherent US policy on China. VP Biden just spent five days in the region and did not utter a single word on the status of Sino-US relations in Pakistan, even though – with US blessings – Pakistan is speeding towards war with India over Pakistan's aggression in Afghanistan.
Allow me to present this issue in simple terms. If a Sino-US alliance on Pakistan/Afghanistan exists, why is Obama not informing Congress about Sino-US military cooperation in the region such as intelligence sharing, joint border defense, and joint actions in the war against terrorism.
On the other hand, if China and the US are not on `the same page in Afghanistan and Pakistan -- despite repeated US protestations that “everything is fine” with Sino-US relations – then Obama should accept Loughner's advice by setting fire to Richard Holbrooke's AFPAK playbook and withdrawing all US forces from Afghanistan and Pakistan immediately.
Washington Post: “Tucson college releases home video of Loughner's ramblings.”
Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee and was the Senior Advisor for International Economics at the Crisis Management Center of the National Security Council, 1984 - 1986. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld,
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 01/18/2011
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback
and comments, share your thoughts on this article,
your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors
Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x600 pixels