Scott Sullivan :
Sudan no-fly Zone?
The Obama administration is apparently oblivious to the emergence of two crises in Sudan. First, themainly NGO's warn that hundreds of thousands of mainly Christian and animist refugees trapped in Sudan's Darfur province face annihilation as a result of the aggressive new military actions by Sudan's Muslim government, as well as by President Obama's refusal to protect Darfur's refugees by establishing a no-fly zone , as Obama promised during his presidential election campaign. According to a Reuters dispatch, more than 70,000 refugees have been forced to flee Darfur over the past several months as a result of the anti-Christian pogroms carried out by the Muslim Khartoum gov ernment.
Moreover, large numbers of new Christian refugees are being created as fighting escalates between the Khartoum government and opposition political forces, following an Obama-brokered agreement that would partition Sudan into a majority Chistian northern state and a majority Muslim southern state. The formal date for dividung Sudan into two states is in July of this year. Meanwhile, Omar Hassan al-Bashir's Islamic government in Khartoum is sabotaging the Obama-brokered separation agreement by shipping weapons to South Sudan's own secessionist tribes. In short, Northern Sudan is turning South Sudan into a failed state well before South Sudan receives independence.
Obama should learn three lessons from his blunders in Sudan.
First, Obama should question the findings of policy assessments advocating the breakup of multi-national states like Sudan into smaller mono-ethnic states. Skepticism is warranted because most instances of ethnic partition from Pakistan in 1947 to Sudan today have led to large scale ethnic conflict within states and even war between states.
Second , Obama owes the Darfur refugees an explanation of why he refuses to honor his campaign to establish a US-led no –fly zone, as he promised during his presidential campaign.
Third, sooner rather than later, Obama may have to deploy US “boots on the ground” in Sudan to protect refugees or to deter civil war between North and South Sudan. In fact, Sudan may even hold rank above Libya as a priority for US military deployments given the greater severity of Sudan's internal problems (i.e., a refugee crisis and a civil war, as noted above). Sudan would also rank above Libya as a priority for US military deployments because of the far greater adverse regional consequences from the collapse of Sudan than the collapse of Libya. I wonder if President Gaddafi has any thoughts on this issue?
Scott Sullivan is a former Washington government employee and was the Senior Advisor for International Economics at the Crisis Management Center of the National Security Council, 1984 - 1986. Petroleumworld not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld,
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 03/30/2011
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback
and comments, share your thoughts on this article,
your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors
Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x600 pixels