Very usefull links





Business Partners




caracas chronicles

Gustavo Coronel


Venezuela Today

Le Blog des
Energies Nouvelles







Pedro M. Burelli :
On "The Pope’s historic visit to Cuba"



Much was written prior to and during Pope Benedict XVI's visit to Cuba. I stated in an earlier commentary that it was best to wait till the papal visit was over to adequately assess its impact. Rather than write a long commentary, I have opted to circulate an excellent piece by my very good friend Tomas Bilbao, with which I fully concur. Tomas has for the last years been deeply involved in Cuban issues as the Executive Director of the Cuba Study Group. The CSG was established by Cuban-American businessmen seeking to get off a 50 year US policy vicious circle that has only helped the Castros sell themselves as 'victims' when they are far from that.

I think reading Tomas' fine piece will give you a very good impression of what many Catholics within the island felt about this visit that was meant to be pastoral, but will probably end up having lasting political impact in a country that has run out of steam but has yet to visualize an alternative to the horrible duo and their accomplices. Faith and the growing ability of the Catholic Church to fill in innumerable gaps in a broken down society will provide comfort to many as the time comes for a sustainable transition from tyranny to liberty.

Pedro Mario Burelli

The Pope’s Historic Visit to Cuba

By Tomas Bilbao
March 29, 2012

Like his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI arrived in Cuba at a crucial time in the nation’s history. Pope John Paul II visited in 1998, a time when Communist Europe had crumbled and expectations of change were high; Pope Benedict XVI landed during a time of unprecedented internal change.

On Monday, the pontiff arrived in a country that for the first time in 50 years has a different president, is undergoing crucial economic reform and—most importantly—has witnessed fundamental societal changes. While the island is still ruled by a single party that routinely tramples on human rights and individual freedoms, the Cuba of today has also openly recognized the failure of its current economic model, has encouraged its citizens to openly debate the need for change, and has even recognized the legitimate role of Cubans living abroad in Cuba’s future. None of this was true 14 years ago when John Paul II visited.

Expectations of change in Cuba are higher today than at any time in the past half-century. Most experts—on the island and abroad—agree that further change is inevitable and that the recent reforms are irreversible. Benedict XVI may lack the charisma and anti-communist credentials of his predecessor, but the Holy Father’s presence alone—and his message of reconciliation—will no doubt facilitate the additional reform we would all like to see in Cuba.

In clear support for the Pope’s message of reconciliation, hundreds of Cuban-Americans also traveled to Cuba this week to worship. For many, this was their first return to the island since leaving five decades ago. For some, including Cuba Study Group co-chairman Carlos Saladrigas, this trip also symbolized a departure from positions they held as recently as 14 years ago.

In 1998, Saladrigas joined others in the exile community to oppose John Paul II’s visit and even helped derail the planned voyage of a cruise ship that would have taken thousands of parishioners to Havana. But for him, the images of Cubans and Cuban-Americans brought together by John Paul II’s message of reconciliation—and the Pope’s calls for Cuba to open to the world and for the world to open to Cuba—provoked profound self-reflection, which eventually led to a change of heart and a new way of thinking. Saladrigas even later brought together other likeminded Cuban-Americans to establish an organization that works to promote change through reconciliation, rather than through decades-old policies designed to bring down the Cuban regime without regard to collateral damage to the Cuban people.
While a lot has changed inside Cuba and in the U.S.-based exile community since John Paul II’s visit, some things have not. In Cuba, human rights and democracy advocates are still harassed and detained in government-led efforts to maintain political control. Benedict XVI’s words following prayers to the Patron Lady of Charity near Santiago reflected the Church’s ongoing concerns: “I have also prayed to the Virgin for the needs of those who suffer, of those who are deprived of freedom, those who are separated from their loved ones or who are undergoing times of difficulty,” he said.

The pontiff noted before his trip to Mexico that, "Today it is evident that Marxist ideology in the way it was conceived no longer corresponds to reality." After arriving in Cuba, he said he was also praying for “the future of this beloved nation in the ways of justice, peace, freedom, liberty and reconciliation.” At a mass in Santiago, the Pope called on Cubans to “strive to build a renewed and open society, a better society, one more worthy of humanity, and which better reflects the goodness of God.” But Cuban officials sharply demurred by stating, “In Cuba, there will be no political reform."

Meanwhile, in the U.S., an ever-shrinking group of vocal proponents of the longstanding U.S. embargo continue to oppose efforts to break the Cuban people’s isolation through family visits, cultural and academic exchanges—and this historic papal visit. In the lead-up to Monday, hardliners launched coordinated and sometimes vicious attacks on the Cuban Catholic Church. Some even went so far as to question the Pope’s intentions and the mission of the Church on the island.

At an recent event in Washington DC co-sponsored by the Heritage Foundation and Google Ideas, Cuban-American U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) stated, “I am deeply concerned that the Cuban Church has negotiated a political space for themselves in exchange for their moral imperative, and I hope that the Pope’s visit doesn’t reinforce that arrangement because I think it perverts and undermines the moral strength of the Church in Cuba now and moving forward.” But attacks on the Cuban Church and on the Pope himself have continued. Some have even dismissed the Pope’s call for “justice, peace, freedom, liberty and reconciliation” as “banalities.”

The attacks by hardliners are no surprise. They are part of a careful strategy to position the hardline exile community as the brokers of Cuba’s future. They are meant to defend policies that hardliners once helped design to precipitate the collapse of Cuban Communism—with the hope of one day stepping in to dictate Cuba’s future. The clout of the Cuban Church is growing and this is the real reason behind the all-out, coordinated attack on the Pope and his visit. This is why the same people who so vehemently oppose loosening travel restrictions to Cuba and attack fellow Cuban-Americans travel to the island to engage the Cuban people.

Fortunately, the millions of Cubans and Cuban-Americans who have been moved by the Pope’s message and the spiritual and humanitarian work of the Catholic Church of Cuba far outnumber the critics. As in the past, Cubans and Cuban-Americans have voted with their feet and proven that Cuban-American legislators and those who defend the status quo are out of touch with their community and with the Cuban people.

Echoing the words of Pope John Paul II, Benedict XVI wrapped up his trip to Cuba yesterday with a mass before thousands in Havana in which he said, “Cuba and the world need change…but this will only occur if each one is in a position to seek the truth and chooses the path of love, sowing reconciliation and brotherhood.’’

Many Cubans on the island and in exile have already proven they can change for the benefit of Cuba’s future. What remains to be seen is whether defenders of the status quo might one day do the same.

Follow us and post your comments: in Twitter Facebook

Pedro M. Burelli is a financial consultant, a former member of PDVSA board of director and ex head of JPMorgan Capital Corporation – Latin America. Most of his articles can be read at Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note:

All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to:

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Internet web links to are appreciated

Petroleumworld News 04/09/2011

Follow us in Twitter
And post your comments in our
Facebook site

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback
and comments, share your thoughts on this article,
your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to

Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors

Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to:
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x
600 pixels



Editor:Elio Ohep F./
Contact Email:

Contact: phone: Office (58 212) 635 7252,
or Cel (58 412) 996 3730 or
(58  412) 952 5301

CopyRight © 1999-2010, Elio Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

- CCS Office Tele
phone/Teléfonos Oficina: (58 212) 635 7252

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

Technorati Profile

Fair use notice of copyrighted material:

Legal Information

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.