Robert Campbell :Oil market balance
emboldens Iran's opponents
Western diplomats can hardly believe their luck. Sanctions against Iran's oil exports are proving more effective than hoped yet the impact on the price of crude has so far been minimal.
It was not supposed to be this way. A decade of Iranian intransigence over its disputed nuclear program had finally eroded Western patience. Sanctions were supposed to be a painful, but necessary step.
Spurred by fears of a wider Middle Eastern conflict if Israel acted unilaterally to strike at Iran , Western governments decided to endure the consequences of tougher sanctions if they offered a peaceful route to resolving the issue.
But so far, the pain has mostly been inflicted on Iran.
Consider the situation in February after the European Union adopted its import ban. The International Energy Agency warned up to 1 million barrels per day of Iran's 2.6 million bpd of oil exports could be affected by tighter Western sanctions.
Brent crude had risen to a six-month high in early February, fueled by geopolitical worries, although the market was taking the looming sanctions impact "in its stride," according to the IEA.
Brent would later gain to nearly $130 a barrel, driven up by a combination of optimism over global economic growth and fears that this growth would drive up oil demand just as Iranian shipments withered.
But fears of a slowdown in global economic growth have sent the benchmark futures contract back down to near $100 a barrel, roughly where they were when Europe first publicly discussed a ban on imports of Iranian crude.
This result has been due more to luck than foresight. At the time the European ban began to be seriously discussed, Western governments believed a large release of strategic oil stocks would be needed to calm the oil market.
Now due to the global slowdown, and extra oil supplies from Saudi Arabia , the loss of some Iranian oil production has so far not affected the balance between crude supply and demand.
The benign situation could easily change, however. Oil traders are already nervous that the sanctions may working a little too well and flip the oil market into a supply deficit.
Restrictions on buying shipping insurance in European markets and stepped up measures by the United States against Iran's international financial transactions have greatly complicated Tehran's oil exports to major customers in Asia.
The current oil price scenario doubtlessly came into the equation as the United States weighed how tightly it would enforce its own sanctions regime.
If oil had been near $140 a barrel it is conceivable that Western governments might have overlooked some outlets for Iranian oil. After all, many market observers assumed earlier this year that supply and demand might only remain in balance if the West tacitly permitted Iran to export much of the crude it was not able to send to Europe.
Instead, as we saw last week, countries like Kenya find the sanctions complicating deals for Iranian crude.
Right now the risks to oil demand growth remain overwhelmingly on the downside. And the supply situation is forecast to be favorable.
A number of OPEC members outside of Iran will add new capacity next year. And non-OPEC oil production should move higher through 2013.
Little wonder the IEA's new 2013 oil market forecasts look fairly benign.
Global demand is seen averaging 90.9 million bpd, up 1 million bpd from 2012, but the amount OPEC will need to pump on average to balance the market should fall 400,000 bpd to an even 30 million bpd.
Moreover OPEC spare production capacity is expected to edge higher by 245,000 bpd as growth in other countries outweighs an expected 570,000 bpd decline in Iranian output capacity.
So far, so good, right? Next year should see Iran's influence over oil markets diminish while soft demand growth gives supply a chance to catch up.
This scenario assumes a great deal. Global oil demand does not have to grow much faster than expected to eat away at that modest gain in OPEC spare capacity.
Nor is this outcome so far fetched. Despite the global economic slowdown, the IEA's latest forecast for 2012 oil demand is identical to that published in February: 89.9 million bpd.
Fourth quarter demand has been revised down to 90.9 million bpd, but that is only 300,000 bpd less than the February forecast.
The same goes for supply growth. A few project delays or faster-than-anticipated decline rates could diminish the actual growth in global oil supplies.
A similar situation holds within OPEC. Although production capacity growth is expected from stable countries like the United Arab Emirates, Libya and Iraq are also expected to make large contributions.
But neither of the latter two countries can be described as politically stable. Unrest could force the postponement of new projects.
Nor can problems elsewhere in OPEC, or a bigger than expected fall in Iranian oil production be ruled out.
PAIN ONLY DEFERRED?
The problem with sanctions is that they are quite hard to lift. Once in place they become totems of prestige.
Look no further than the history of sanctions against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, which were in place for more than a decade and were no where near being lifted when the United States moved to topple the regime.
So too with Iran, I suspect. The West would pay a heavy diplomatic price if a surging oil prices forced a dilution of the sanctions regime.
However the impact of a lengthy standoff between Iran and the West will be the destruction of a large part of Iran's oil export capacity.
Without investment and modern technology, Iran's aging oil fields will struggle to sustain even the modest output expected in 2013.
Yet it is currently very hard to imagine a situation where the nuclear issue is resolved to the satisfaction of all parties, allowing a major boost in Iranian oil investment.
This may not be a problem now, but could easily become one if global growth shifts into a higher gear.
Follow us and post your comments: in Twitter Facebook
Robert Campbell is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own . Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This commentary was originally published by Reuters , on July 13, 2012 . Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.
Editor's Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 07/17/2012
Follow us in Twitter
And post your comments in our Facebook site
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback
and comments, share your thoughts on this article,
your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors
Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x600 pixels