Julian Lee: All hail Saudi Arabia's oil victory
Opec's market-share strategy brought rampant
growth in U.S. Lower 48 oil supply to an abrupt end.
We had BP's "Beyond Petroleum," now Saudi oil minister Khalid Al-Falih is setting the scene for "Beyond Market Share."
The so-called market share strategy it imposed on OPEC in November 2014, where it decided to defend its dominance by pumping more crude, has worked. The war on high-cost oil is won. Now it's time to win the peace.
You might ask how I can possibly argue the Saudis have won. After all, didn't they just abandon that very same strategy without killing U.S. shale, with their economy buckling under the pressure of sub-$50 oil?
I don't see it like that. I never liked the simplistic view of a battle between Saudi and shale, where victory could only be secured by the industry's destruction. It was always more subtle. As I've written before, the policy was a response to the Saudi realization that, if oil stayed at $100 a barrel, OPEC (which really means Saudi Arabia) would have had to keep cutting supply to maintain prices -- thereby creating room for high-cost oil producers. American shale was only ever the most visible part of that "enemy", but not all of it and certainly not the most expensive.
As Al-Falih said at last week's Oil & Money conference in London, if OPEC had cut output in November 2014 to support prices, it would have had to do so again in 2015 and 2016. Instead, its production has increased by 2.4 million barrels a day, excluding the impact of newly returned members Indonesia and Gabon.
OPEC Market Grab
OPEC's oil production (excluding returning members) has soared under its market-share strategy
Opec's market-share strategy brought rampant growth in U.S. Lower 48 oil supply to an abrupt end.
OPEC would never be able to kill shale entirely, only put it in hibernation, and that's really all it needed to do. Much has changed in the two years since November 2014. Back then, U.S. shale oil output was rising by about 1 million daily barrels each year. Now it has stagnated. Sure, growth will return as crude prices recover, but at $60 a barrel it's unlikely to reach anything like 1 million barrels a day.
We've also seen an almost total halt in big new conventional oil projects. BP CEO Bob Dudley, speaking at the same conference, said he will continue to invest, but only in the "best projects," which probably won't include deep-water frontier exploration. It recently pulled out of such a project off Australia.
We're also coming towards the end of new projects sanctioned before the oil crash. Yes, we've seen some big fields start producing this year, not least Kazakhstan's much-delayed Kashagan. But the number of new fields still to start producing is dwindling.
The oil industry has always been characterized by long lead times and that's still true. The advent of U.S. shale may have sped things up for that part of the industry, but even shale lead times will probably lengthen as it moves beyond its American birthplace.
So how does Riyadh secure its victory? If it's genuinely interested in a "stable" oil market -- and I believe it is -- then it needs to look beyond the immediate oversupply, which is slowly correcting, and try to set the terms for future production growth two to three years down the line.
Exxon's Rex Tillerson, also speaking at Oil & Money, said it was "difficult" to see a supply shortage in the next three to five years. That's based on an assumption that a big part of U.S. shale oil supply is viable at $60 a barrel, which may well be where Saudi Arabia is comfortable seeing oil prices end up (the view of one Saudi Aramco director at the conference).
The kingdom is now engaged in the most delicate of balancing acts. It wants a modest price recovery that encourages enough investment to avoid future supply shortages and price spikes. At the same time, it doesn't want to spur another shale oil tsunami. For now, it's walking the line with aplomb, but the real test will come when OPEC meets at the end of November.
Julian Lee is an oil strategist for Bloomberg First Word. Previously he worked as a senior analyst at the Centre for Global Energy Studies. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This commentary was originally published by Bloomberg News, 10/23/2016. Link to original article. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by theoriginator.Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Copyright© 1999-2009 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments,
share your thoughts on this article, your feed. back is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 10/24/2016
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Send this story to a friend Write to firstname.lastname@example.org
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels