Former U.S. mexican ambassadors:
Treat Mexico as a strategic US partner
Since NAFTA was signed in 1993, American jobs linked to trade with Mexico grew from 700,000
to 4.9 million. The value of our two-way trade has grown six-fold, reaching $584 billion in 2015.
Mexico is of enormous importance to the United States. We have strong strategic interests in a relationship of respect and collaboration with Mexico while we work through differences on trade, security, and migration.
U.S.-Mexico relations touch the daily lives of more Americans than ties with any other country, whether through culture, commerce or travel. American prosperity and the security of our homeland are deeply affected by the type of relationship we have with our southern neighbor.
Much can be improved between Mexico and the United States for the good of both countries, but tackling these challenges need not be a win-lose proposition. Both countries can gain security and prosperity. Reviving the animosity and “distance” that characterized our relationship in the '70s or '80s is dangerous and runs counter to our interests.
The six of us have served as U.S. ambassadors to Mexico, managing the ever-improving relationship across Democratic and Republican administrations since the late 1980s. We have seen firsthand the strategic value of working cooperatively with Mexico to tackle common problems, including crime, terrorism and global economic competition. Along the way, Mexico has become a more democratic and prosperous country, making it a better and more reliable partner.
We are now deeply concerned to see this foundation shaken. Public attitudes in both countries are being soured by exaggerated public accusations. Mexicans believe that their national “dignity” has been insulted. Champions of closer cooperation with the United States are on the defensive. Nationalist voices are gaining traction. This is not in America's long-term interest.
The United States and Mexico started our modern journey to closer partnership with the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement. Collectively, the six of us have worked through every stage of NAFTA. This is not a perfect agreement, but neither is it the job killer that some have construed. Since NAFTA was signed in 1993, American jobs linked to trade with Mexico grew from 700,000 to 4.9 million. The value of our two-way trade has grown six-fold, reaching $584 billion in 2015. Mexico is now the second-largest market for U.S. exports — larger than our exports to China, Japan and Germany combined. Mexico is the third-largest buyer of U.S. agricultural products. We build many things together, with parts crossing borders in both directions — so much so, that finished Mexican manufactured exports were found to have
40 percent U.S. content.
It's true that some American jobs moved to Mexico, but others were created by NAFTA. A 2013 study estimated that the United States is $127 billion richer each year because of extra NAFTA trade. New studies have made clear that the big causes of U.S. manufacturing job losses are automation and trade with China, not NAFTA.
NAFTA can be improved to help boost the U.S. economy in such areas as “rule of origin,” services, e-commerce, border inefficiencies and labor standards. Those are the issues that should be negotiated based on facts to strengthen a long-term relationship that makes both countries more competitive.
Energy deserves special mention. Under NAFTA, Mexico's nationalized energy sector was still off limits to U.S. companies. In 2013, Mexico opened investments and trade in oil, natural gas, electricity, renewables and refined fuels to the United States and others. Today, the United States exports more natural gas and gasoline to Mexico than to any country. In December, major U.S. companies won licenses to develop Mexico's oil reserves, while others are partners in new pipelines. These openings make North America more energy secure.
The U.S. deficit with Mexico gets more public attention than it deserves. Mexico represents 8 percent of our deficit. Our deficits with China, the European Union and Japan are larger. The deficit with Mexico declined by over 40 percent from 2010-15, even as our trade grew 35 percent.
A sharp point of contention has been over the border wall and migration. The great irony is that today there are 1.1 million fewer undocumented Mexicans in the United States than in 2007. Apprehensions of Mexicans at the border have reached the lowest levels of this century. Mexico has joined us to manage the surge in migrants from Central America, deporting over 165,000 from its southern border in 2015 — more than the United States did. Publically demanding that Mexico pay for a wall that Mexicans don't think is needed has fueled anti-American nationalism. That limits the capacity of Mexico's government to work with us to find solutions.
Common borders also made Mexico and the United States partners in national security. Ever since 9/11, Mexico and the United States have worked closely to stop potential terrorists from entering the United States. We also work to improve the fight against illicit trafficking. The illegal trafficking of heroin and other drugs into the United States and the smuggling of weapons and drug profits into Mexico fuel violence, corruption and deaths in both countries. Still, during the years of our collective service, law enforcement officials have built trust, competency and legal channels to act against criminal networks. That cooperation needs to be strengthened, not undermined.
Together, we have witnessed profound and positive changes in the U.S.-Mexico relationship over the last quarter century. We urge that the United States engage in serious, fact-based negotiations over differences on trade and other issues. Intimidating or denigrating remarks make it harder to reach outcomes that support American economic and security interests and it fuels anti-Americanism in Mexico.
Ultimately, workers, companies and communities of both countries will prosper with a long-term strategic partnership between the United States and Mexico. Let's keep building it.
Commentary by John D. Negroponte was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 1989-1993. James R. Jones was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 1993-1997. Jeffrey Davidow was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 1998-2002. Antonio Garza was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 2002-2009. He writes for The Monitor's Board of Contributors. Carlos Pascual was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 2009-2011. Earl Anthony Wayne was the U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 2011-2015. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This commentary was published by The Monitor on Feb. 19, 2017. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.
All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by theoriginator.Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.Copyright© 1999-2009 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source.
Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 02/ 13 /2017
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Send this story to a friend
Write to email@example.com
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels