Mohamed A. El-Erian
/ Bloomberg:
Oil gets caught in a perfect storm
Simon Dawson/Bloomberg
Oil prices are falling.
Prices are being pushed lower by uncertainty about demand,
increased
production and skepticism about OPEC's determination to curb output.
Demand uncertainty, high production and skepticism about the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries' resolve to curb output have come together to drive oil prices sharply lower. This perfect storm is raising questions about both short- and long-term price stability, placing even greater pressure on many of the top non-U.S. producers that are set to meet in Vienna on Dec. 3.
To better understand what's ahead, market participants would be well advised to draw insights from what economists call the “cobweb theorem,” an economic model that helps explains price dynamics.
Last week, oil prices fell 10 percent in volatile trading that was amplified by signs of frantic repositioning by some market participants. The price for the WTI blend has plummeted by one-third in less than two months, to $50 at the end of last week from a high of $76 on Oct. 3. Some analysts are warning that the market may even be repeating the pattern of a few years ago, when oil prices collapsed by more than half, from close to $90 in November 2014 to just $41 in January 2016.
Three distinct factors have driven the recent price retreat, which occurred despite further U.S. sanctions on Iran that limit that country's ability to export oil:
- More evidence of a weakening global economy, including disappointing data from Europe and mounting concerns about China's economic well-being.
- Confirmation that U.S. production is booming, including a doubling in shale production since 2012.
- Repeated calls by President Donald Trump for Saudi Arabia to avoid any actions that would result in higher oil prices.
Saudi Arabia recently signaled its interest in leading a new effort to stabilize prices by cutting its own output as part of a more general reduction that would involve both OPEC and non-OPEC producers (notably Russia). But many market participants believe the likelihood of translating this into effective action has been diminished by political developments.
Trump has waged a Twitter campaign calling not just for lower oil prices overall but also for Saudi Arabia specifically to avoid any action that would block the downward trend. The credibility of Trump's efforts has been enhanced by his decision to refrain from taking action against Saudi Arabia over the assassination of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Now that they've received a pass from Trump, it would be hard to envision top Saudi officials taking explicit action to raise oil prices.
All of this translates into a difficult short-term outlook for oil prices. In addition to the lack of support from both demand and supply fundamentals, the market has to navigate the weakening of another stabilization anchor: OPEC's coordination with Russia and some other producers to balance output and current use at higher prices. These developments also point to trickier longer-term prospects, confirming a change in an important aspect of where and how the role of swing producer is pursued.
After trying a hands-off approach at the end of 2014 and retreating from leading OPEC's swing producer function, Saudi Arabia resumed its traditional leadership position two years later but with some operational changes that increased the short-term effectiveness of this price-stabilization role. These modifications included greater coordination with Russia and some other non-OPEC producers, and greater flexibility within OPEC. Yet the oil cartel's very position as swing producer is challenged by the increasing influence of the U.S.
With its higher production and more vocal views on prices, the U.S. has increasingly been asserting its role as another de facto swing producer for the oil market, thereby diluting the traditional role of OPEC. And unlike OPEC, an important part of America's role -- currently assumed by private sector shale production, and lacking public sector direction or intervention -- is being pursued differently, suggesting large swings over a typical price cycle. Remember, shale production and investment tend to react to price changes with a longer time lag (though it has shortened somewhat in recent years).
To grasp the resulting price dynamics, oil market participants should acquaint themselves with insights from the cobweb theorem, an approach that was once very popular for explaining price movements in the commodity sector, particularly agriculture.
Simply put, the theorem incorporates lags in assessing how producers' output decisions respond to price developments, highlighting why price may not converge to its demand/supply-determined equilibrium level in an orderly and timely fashion. Not only does it take time to spiral in toward the equilibrium price level but, in some instances, it can spiral out for a period, resulting in wild price fluctuations and some potential breakages for both suppliers and consumers.
The implications of last week's sharp decline in oil prices go beyond the usual range of economic and market influences. The fall also provides an insight into the gradual structural changes experienced by a market that plays an important role in a wide range of production, investment and consumption decisions.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published by Bloomberg, Nov. 26, 2018. All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld Copyright© 1999-2018 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 11 /26 /2018
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Follow us in : 
twitter / 
Facebook
Send this story to a friend Write to editor@petroleumworld.com
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels
