/ Bloomberg: Just exactly
where is the final frontier?
Virgin Galactic's SpaceshipTwo went to space, or almost to space.
The line between atmosphere and outer space is surprisingly debatable.
Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo may or may not have crossed it.
There is no sign saying “Welcome to Outer Space” when a ship such as Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo arrives at its edge, as it reportedly did on Thursday. The atmosphere doesn't abruptly end, but thins out gradually. The craft's maximum altitude of 51.4 miles was lower than the 100 kilometer (62-mile) limit set by the Ansari X prize back in 2004. (This was won by SpaceShipOne, then of Mojave Aerospace Ventures, which maxed out at 69.7 miles.)
Is it OK to lower the bar on the edge of space? Who gets to decide where space begins? Virgin Galactic and its competitors in the space tourism trade would like to make it low enough to say their customers are getting there. (Though moving the line won't affect Elon Musk if he pulls off his promised trek around the moon.)
The boundary shouldn't be an arbitrary one. Astrophysicist and space historian Jonathan McDowell argues that the edge of space should be defined by physics. In keeping track of space history, it matters who gets official credit for getting there first. In the mid-20th century, scientists tried to set that limit at how low you can go and still sustain an orbit — an altitude known as the Karman line, named after aerospace engineer Theodore von Karman. At some point atmospheric drag becomes too big a factor to sustain even a highly elliptical orbit — one that swings in close and then out much farther.
For years, the official Karman line has been set at 100 kilometers. But that was not the value Karman set for it. In a paper published earlier this year in the journal Acta Astronautica , McDowell recalculated the Karman line, and found it's considerably closer — just close enough to make SpaceShipTwo a space-faring craft.
When I called McDowell, who works at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, he said that the U.S. government has long resisted creating an official legal boundary between air and space, even though there's a need for one. Aircraft are subject to rules regarding airspace, and objects in space are not, but are subject to international treaties on the peaceful use of space.
When North Korea launched a missile last year, reportedly over Japanese airspace , it was actually higher than the International Space Station, McDowell said. “Of course it's in space, and it doesn't make sense to say it's in Japanese airspace,” he said, but without an international agreement about the boundary between air and space, such confusion is inevitable.
He said that people had previously tried to calculate the Karman line back in the 1950s and early 1960s, and they got values pretty close to his value, which was 80 kilometers (50 miles). But in the late 1960s, it was set at 100 kilometers. It wasn't clear why, except that people didn't think it was necessary to do the exact calculations, and this was a nice round number. It's clearly higher than airplanes can fly — which is only about 50 kilometers. There's a gap, he said, between where air-y things can fly, and space-y things can sustain an orbit.
The limit for space-y things isn't absolute because denser objects can go through thicker atmosphere and stay in orbit; a feather has a higher Karman limit than a bowling ball. And there are seasonal and regional differences in atmospheric density. But 80 kilometers looks like a much better approximation than 100 kilometers. Which reopens an old question: Who got to space first?
The German V-2 rockets would have been the first to reach space, in the 1940s. And the first humans to get there? The pilots of the X-15 Space Plane, McDowell said. This joint NASA-Defense Department project looked like a rocket with little wings. It flew 200 times between 1959 and 1968, carried under a B52 bomber and released over Nevada.
Despite the setting of the Karman limit at 100 kilometers, the U.S. did decide to grant astronaut wings to all X-15 pilots who went over 80 kilometers (50 miles). “This is one of the reasons astronaut wings are a thing,” McDowell said. They are granted by NASA and the Air Force to all pilots who reach that altitude. The astronaut wings are still a thing, and Virgin Galactic has reported that their pilots Mark Stucky and Frederick Sturckow will get theirs, though Sturckow, a NASA pilot, presumably already has astronaut wings.
Having an official, legal, science-based definition of space would get rid of any ambiguity surrounding the granting of wings and other facets of space history. According to a story in SpaceNews , international bodies are considering making 80 kilometers official.
Farther out, there's a boundary defined by the Earth's magnetic field, where we're shielded from the wind of charged particles coming off the sun. And farther still, there's a boundary between our solar system's bubble of solar wind and true interstellar space, into which the spacecraft Voyager 2 crossed earlier this month , a few years behind its predecessor, Voyager 1.
What we're really talking about here is different realms of space, because, as a precocious 7-year-old recently pointed out to my editor, all inhabitants of Earth are travelling through space. The fact that there are different kinds of space is part of what makes it so interesting to explore.
Faye Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. She has written for the Economist, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Psychology Today, Science and other publications. She has a degree in geophysics from the California Institute of Technology. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published by Bloomberg, on Dec. 15, 2018. All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
Hit your target - Advertise with us
PW 300.000 plus request per week
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated. Petroleumworld Copyright© 1999-2018 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 12 /17 /2018
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Send this story to a friend
Write to firstname.lastname@example.org
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels