Eli Lake
/ Bloomberg:Trump
courts
catastrophe in Syria
Delil Souleiman/AFP
Does the U.S. really want to abandon them?
Islamic State is not defeated, and a U.S. withdrawal would be an abandonment of Kurdish allies.
President Donald Trump is on the verge of making a spectacularly bad decision. The White House is soon expected to announce its plans to remove the 2,000 U.S. troops now serving in northeastern Syria.
This is not totally unexpected. Trump ran for president in part on the idea of smashing the Islamic State, but he also said there was no point in trying to stabilize the country after the terrorists were defeated. Since getting elected, he has regularly signaled that its time for U.S. forces to leave Syria. In March he promised the U.S. would be getting out of Syria “like, very soon.” In June, he floated a plan for an all-Arab army to replace the U.S. in a meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah.
Nonetheless, special-operations forces have remained in Syria, where they train and fight alongside largely Kurdish troops. Together they coordinate air strikes against the remaining pockets of Islamic State fighters and serve as a buffer between Turkey and Kurdish militias.
This time it looks like Trump is serious. To start, as the Wall Street Journal has reported , the U.S. military has already begun telling its partners to prepare for a U.S. withdrawal. Instead of tamping down the news, Trump himself tweeted Wednesday: “We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump Presidency.”
As usual, Trump's assessment is hyperbolic. It is also technically correct. The Islamic State has lost enormous amounts of territory, thanks to a powerful alliance between U.S. and Kurdish fighters. But it's not that simple.
Ambassador James Jeffrey, the U.S. special representative for Syria, told the Atlantic Council this week that America's goal is the “enduring defeat of Isis.” The adjective is important. “ISIS will come back if the underlying conditions are receptive to that kind of ideological movement,” Jeffrey said. That's a fancy way of saying a withdrawal without a plan to protect civilians from barrel bombs and Iranian-backed militias will create the same kind of opening al Qaeda and the Islamic State have seized before.
Beyond the Islamic State, there is also Turkey. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has promised to launch a new offensive against America's Kurdish allies unless the U.S. promises to cut them off. These are the same Kurds who, when the war against the Islamic State was at its most dire in 2015, were the only force on the ground in Syria willing and capable of working with Americans. That's one of the reasons why the U.S. began working with the autonomous Kurdish authorities then and continues to do so today.
Capitulating now to Turkish demands would send a terrible message. Erdogan would conclude that threatening U.S. interests pays off. Meanwhile, other groups that have joined the American side in the Middle East would conclude the U.S. is an unreliable ally. It's particularly galling to contemplate a withdrawal just as Kurdish forces are engaged in fierce fighting to liberate one of the last Islamic State holdouts, the town of Hanin.
Yet the U.S. is already preparing the Kurds for an end to their relationship. As Jeffrey told the Atlantic Council: “We do not have permanent relationships with substate entities.” His mission for now is to get a political process moving forward through the United Nations to end the fighting and form a more inclusive government that can begin rebuilding the country.
That's a fine goal. But now that the president has telegraphed America's intention to leave Syria, the U.S. will have even less leverage to shape it.
Eli Lake is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering national security and foreign policy. He was the senior national security correspondent for the Daily Beast and covered national security and intelligence for the Washington Times, the New York Sun and UPI. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published by Bloomberg, on Dec. 19, 2018. All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
Hit your target - Advertise with us
PW 300.000 plus request per week
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated. Petroleumworld Copyright© 1999-2018 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 12 /20 /2018
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Follow us in : 
twitter / 
Facebook
Send this story to a friend
Write to editor@petroleumworld.com
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels