Carl Bildt / Washington Post: The end of an era in Europe
German Chancellor Angela Merke
She went from having a U.S. president who genuinely liked Germany to one who seems
to see her country far more as an enemy than an ally — and she kept her composure.
Everyone is talking about the end of an era in Europe — and that's correct. Angela Merkel has declared her intention to step down, first as Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader and then, in 2021 at the latest, as chancellor.
In power in Berlin for 13 years, Merkel has been a towering personality in the complicated politics of European integration, partly because of the sheer size and weight of Germany, but to a very large degree because of her personality and style. She always listens carefully to the concerns and arguments of others, dissects the facts of any given situation, and then patiently explores the possible ways of moving forward. Germany in the Merkel era certainly hasn't been the bully of Europe in the way it's sometimes portrayed, but rather the discreet facilitator.
It hasn't been an uncomplicated period. There have certainly been issues inside the European Union, but even more important have been the rather fundamental changes in its external environment. Merkel assumed power when there was still the hope that Europe could build stability by projecting its soft power and its model of shared sovereignty to its neighborhood and the outside world. She will leave when protecting Europe from the instability of the surrounding world has become the political priority. We have seen the rise of a revisionist Russia in the East, a meltdown of the Middle East in the South and a profound disruption in the orientation of the Anglo-Saxon world on both sides of the Atlantic.
But in spite of widespread expectations to the contrary, particularly in the United States, the Greek and the Euro crisis were overcome, and Europe has come out with strengthened rather than weakened institutions after the post-2008 economic crisis. Merkel was a key part of this.
She has held Russia to the fire over its aggression against Ukraine, in spite of some initial rumblings in German business circles and a traditional leftist nostalgia for the old Ostpolitik days, and kept the E.U. united in its approach. I doubt anyone else could have done it.
She went from having a U.S. president who genuinely liked Germany to one who seems to see her country far more as an enemy than an ally — and she kept her composure.
Her critics will continue to fault her for the refugee crisis of 2015. But the reality was that border controls in Greece imploded, leaving the Balkans open to migrants; Hungary sent them to Austria, and Austria dumped them on the German border. The real failure was not stopping the war in Syria, or giving the hundred of thousands of refugees in the camps and in Turkey the help and the hope they needed. And many must be blamed for that failure.
Since then, Merkel has been part of the effort to build up our bastions. The refugee deal with Turkey was as controversial as it was essential, and I doubt anyone else could have done it. And now E.U. policies across the board are beefed up. For the chancellor of Germany head to Niger to help that extremely fragile state manage its migration pressures is also part of the approach.
Her turnaround of energy policies, suddenly abandoning nuclear energy, is widely supported in Germany, but here question marks must remain. She led the E.U. in fostering genuine concern over climate change, but she has struggled with Germany's own commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in view of the nuclear phaseout.
The politics of Europe have changed in rather fundamental ways. The age of ideology has given way to the age of identity, and so we have seen the gradual decline of the large integrating political parties that were so important for stability for decades. The social democratic parties are mere shadows of their past, and even Merkel's own CDU, still one of the best-performing parties on the continent, is struggling.
Much attention has, rightly, been given to the rise of the far right in Germany and elsewhere in the wake of the immigration crisis of 2015. But if recent trends in different countries are to be believed, its support has now stabilized at well below 20 percent — with Italy as the exception.
In Germany it looks as though the Greens, with a program diametrically opposed to the far-right populists, are the rising political force. But the pattern across Europe is that we see a fragmentation of the political landscape, with governance becoming increasingly complicated. It took months for Germany to set up the grand coalition government that is now struggling to survive, and when Sweden will get a new government after its early September election is anybody's guess. This is the new pattern of the politics of Europe.
So where are we going now?
We don't know who will take the helm at the CDU in December, and for how long a time that new leader would like to see Merkel remaining as chancellor. Next summer will see important decisions on the leadership positions in the E.U., for the next five years, following the May elections to the European Parliament. I would expect Merkel to be around and to put her imprint on these.
And then a new era will begin.
Carl Bildt is a Swedish politician and diplomat who was Prime Minister of Sweden from 1991 to 1994. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published by The Washington Post on Oct 30 , 2018. All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
PW 300.000 plus request per week
Hit your target - Advertise with us
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated. Petroleumworld Copyright© 1999-2018 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.
Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 11 05/2018
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels