& Tobago


Very usefull links


News links




Dow Jones

Oil price



Views and News






SBM Offshore builders of Guyana’s
Liza Destiny under Swiss probe


The US$720M FPSO Liza Destiny made by SBM.

By Kaieteur News

Petroleumworld 12 03 2020

SBM Offshore, the Dutch company that is contracted to build two more floating production storage and offloading vessels (oil ships) for Guyana’s Stabroek Block operations, is now facing a probe by the authorities in Switzerland for past cases of corruption.

Even though the cases would have been settled in other nations, the Swiss government is adamant that it wants to do its own probe now, with particular focus on a former SBM employee that was central to the bribery schemes. It did not disclose the name of that person of interest.
Be that as it may, Erik Lagendijk, the Chief Governance and Compliance Officer for SBM was keen to note that the company intends to cooperate with the probe. The employee said, “We did not expect this development in Switzerland…We will engage with the Swiss public prosecutor and seek clarification.”

Since the announcement of the probe, SBM’s shares fell 3.5% on the Amsterdam stock market.

During its research on the history of SBM Offshore, Kaieteur News found that more than five years ago, the offshore drilling equipment manufacturer was caught red handed in damning acts of bribery in Brazil, Angola, Equatorial Guinea, Kazakhstan and Iraq. Details of the case note that SBM executives bribed officials with about US$180M over a period of about a decade beginning in the mid-1990s. These bribes resulted in the company benefitting from approximately US$2.8B in profits. Subsequent lawsuits led by the public prosecutor of its home country, the Netherlands, the US Department of Justice, and the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, resulted in millions of dollars in fines being paid.

When SBM’s US subsidiary was hauled before the courts for breach of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), it pleaded guilty and agreed to settle criminal charges of bribing officials in the five countries. It paid a US$238 million penalty.

In Brazil, the company agreed to enter a settlement so that it could end all anti-corruption investigations against its subsidiary there. The US$189M settlement was done so that it could not only kill the probe into the company’s role, but also allow it to participate again in future tenders. The investigation in Brazil was centered on allegations that SBM was one of several companies that paid massive bribes in exchange for inflated contracts to service Petrobras, Brazil’s National Oil Company.

In the case of its home country, the Netherlands authorities launched its own investigations and got SBM to pay a US$40M fine as well as a US$200M disgorgement (having to do with repayment of ill-gotten gains) via an out-of-court settlement. Following this, SBM said it enhanced its anti-corruption compliance programme and related internal controls to prevent a reoccurrence of any kind.

Owing to the fact that the Netherlands is considered one of the least corrupt countries within the European Union (EU), the authorities which settled with SBM were highly criticized by transparency bodies there for not going forward with the prosecution of such a high-profile corruption case, among others.

It was believed that settlement lends to the perception of backroom politics while providing the opportunity for the authorities to abuse their power by allowing settlements in cases where the suspect has more to gain by settling quickly.

Story by Kaieteur News 12 02 2020


We invite you to join us as a sponsor.

Circulated Videos, Articles, Opinions and Reports which carry your name and brand are used to target Entrepreneurs through our site, promoting your organization’s services. The opportunity is to insert in our stories pages short attention-grabbing videos, or to publish your own feature stories.


Copyright© 1999-2020 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ (PW) stories by anyone provided it mentions as the source.

Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. Internet web links to are appreciated.

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to

By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to:

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels

Twitter: @petroleumworld1




Editor & Publisher:Elio Ohep/
Contact Email:

CopyRight © 1999-2020 Petroleumworld- All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

CopyRight©1999-2020, Petroleumworld   / Elio Ohep - All rights reserved


This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.