Bolivia

Venezuela

Trinidad
&
Caribbean








Very usefull links




ISSUES....
Inside, confidential, off the record




Baker takes US Presidency

 

James Baker, with a big assist from Iran, is preparing to edge out President
George W. Bush and his designated successor, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to
place his own man in the job.

The key to the success of this plan is the likely Baker-Hamilton
recommendation that the US and Iran agree to share power in Iraq, a
recommendation that, if accepted by President Bush, will bring down the
Bush-Cheney administration and push the decision on the future president
into the US House of Representatives.


The Baker-Hamilton recommendation for US power sharing in Iraq will not work
because it comes too late. Iran already has the upper hand. Tel Koppel,
who has just completed a documentary on Iran for the Discovery Channel, said
in a recent interview, that as of today "Iran has more influence in Iraq
than the US." Freeze that frame. Who needs the Baker plan? Iraq now
belongs to Iran, after the loss of all that US blood and treasure.

How does Iran gain influence in Iraq? Iran is doing it just like the US --
boots on the ground. Well in advance of the US withdrawal, Iran is building
a substantial military presence in Iraq. IranFocus.com today exposes the
linkage between Iran's feared intelligence service (the MOIS), Iran's
regular army, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards elite Qods task force, and
Iraq's Badr Brigade, a Shia milityia affiliated with the SCIRI party, which
is Ambassador Khalilzad's favorite Iraqi political party (see "Iran is
Behind the Badr Brigade" 17 November 06).

What Iran is building in Iraq is another Hezbollah, just like the one that
is today taking over Lebanon at Iran's behest. Thanks to Ambassador
Khalilzad, who is now being mentioned as the next US ambassador to the UN,
the Iranian-financed and controlled Badr Brigade, as an SCIRI partner, now
essentially owns Iran's Interior Ministry, whose police are promoting civil
war via attacks on Iraqi Sunnis and on the anti-Iran Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi
Army.

Again, freeze that frame. Ambassador Khalilzad is cooperating with Iran to
advance Iran's plan to foment civil war in Iraq as the quickest means of
inducing a US withdrawal. Then, once US forces are out, and Syria and the
Arab states are sidelined in Iraq, Iran will be positioned to annex as much
of Iraq as it wants.

We know this is happening because the Bush Administration is already
releasing trial balloons that signal a US retreat in Iraq on behalf of Iran,
along with a US betrayal (the latest in a series) of the Arab states.

To be specific, the Guardian Newspaper reports that a certain David
Satterfield, identified as the State Department's top man on Iraq, when
testifying before Congress yesterday, said the US will open channels to Iran
to discuss mutual interests in Iraq, but not Syria.

With this decision, which was concealed from the US Congress until it was
finalized, State and Baker-Hamilton have picked precisely the most dangerous
and morally debased option; i.e. US-Iran collaboration in occupying Iraq.

Not to worry, the Iraqis will never accept Iran as an occupying power, even
if Iran comes into Iraq under a US flag.

Two big losers are evident, however, on the US side: President George W.
Bush and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. President Bush is a loser because he
has been swindled by James Baker. To understate this point, Iran will not
be a reliable US partner in Iraq, as it is not in Lebanon. It can safely be
predicted that Baker's pro-Iran breakthrough will, over time, collapse what
is left of the Bush presidency.

Speaker Pelosi is a potential loser because the Bush presidency will come
crashing down on her. Is it possible that when she sees Rep. Hoyer she sees
James Baker, who would prefer to have his own man, finally, after Clinton
and George W. Bush, in the Oval Office?

ISSUES....

Is an independent journalist effort from Petroleumworld, on Inside, Confidential
and Off The Record Information, its views are not necessarily those of
Petroleumworld

Legal information: Copyright/Disclaimer


Copyright ©Petroleumworld, 1999-2006, All rights reserved

 

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com


Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com


3


Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels

TOP

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/us code/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from Petroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.