PW : Chevron 1 / Ecuador 0
At last Chevron score on its last Ecuador's vs Chevron saga round on the
bogus case on alleged "environmental justice," by the plaintiffs known as the Ecuador's Amazon Defense Front.
Here is the last of it:
Chevron today announced that an international arbitration tribunal, convened under the authority of the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty (the “BIT”) and administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear Chevron's claims against the Republic of Ecuador. Chevron filed its request for arbitration in 2009, claiming that the Republic violated its obligations under the BIT and international law.
Chevron's arbitration claim stems from the government of Ecuador's exploitation of the ongoing environmental lawsuit against the company in Ecuador and its courts' failure to administer justice in a trial that has been marred by fraud . Additionally, Chevron maintains that the government of Ecuador has failed to uphold prior settlement and release agreements that the government of Ecuador entered into with Texaco Petroleum Company (now a Chevron subsidiary) when the consortium between Texaco Petroleum and Petroecuador was terminated.
“With today's decision, Chevron will proceed to the merits of its arbitration to hold Ecuador responsible for the fraud being committed through its judicial system. The documentary and video evidence of that fraud is irrefutable. The dysfunction of Ecuador's judiciary is well documented in both the Lago Agrio case and the recent El Universo case involving a ghostwritten judgment against journalists,” said Hewitt Pate, Chevron vice president and general counsel. “Rather than allow American plaintiffs' lawyers to cause even more damage for which Ecuador may ultimately be held responsible, the Republic should take this opportunity to pursue a more constructive course.”
Chevron's claim will now proceed to the merits phase of the arbitration. In prior rulings, the tribunal has put the Republic on notice that if Chevron's arbitration ultimately prevails, “any loss arising from the enforcement of (the Lago Agrio judgment) may be losses for which the (Republic) would be responsible to (Chevron) under international law.”
On Feb. 16, 2012, the tribunal issued a Second Interim Award ordering the Republic of Ecuador—and all of its branches, including the judiciary—to prevent enforcement and recognition of the $18.2 billion Lago Agrio judgment, both within and without Ecuador. The award expands upon a prior award requiring Ecuador to “take all measures at its disposal to suspend or cause to be suspended the enforcement or recognition within and without Ecuador of any judgment.”
In August 2011, a different international arbitration tribunal convened under the BIT awarded Chevron and Texaco Petroleum $96 million in a claim against the Republic of Ecuador related to past oil operations. The tribunal found that Ecuador's courts violated the BIT and international law through their decade-long delays in ruling on certain commercial disputes between Texaco Petroleum and the Ecuadorian government.
The tribunal's decision on jurisdiction may be accessed here . A copy of Chevron's 2009 arbitration claim may be accessed here
The facts: Chevron is defending itself against false allegations that it is responsible for alleged environmental and social harms in the Amazon region of Ecuador. Chevron has never conducted oil production operations in Ecuador, and its subsidiary Texaco Petroleum Co. (“TexPet”) fully remediated its share of environmental impacts arising from oil production operations prior to 1992.
After the remediation was certified by all agencies of the Ecuadorian government responsible for oversight, TexPet received a complete release from Ecuador’s national, provincial and municipal governments prior to being acquired by Chevron in 2001.
Ecuador’s state-owned oil company, Petroecuador, was the 62.5 percent majority owner of the consortium in which TexPet participated until 1992 and has been the sole owner of greatly expanded oil operations over the past two decades. Petroecuador did not remediate its majority share of pre-1992 impacts and has amassed a poor environmental record since that time. Chevron mantain that all remaining environmental conditions in the region are the sole legal responsibility of Petroecuador, and in December 2011, Petroecuador announced a $70 million remediation program that would address the balance of the necessary cleanup.
Tuesday International Arbitration Tribunal decision will not be the last of this saga, it is just a continuation of the legal steps to be taken for Chevron to protect its investors patrimony.
Follow us and post your comments: in Twitter Facebook
Editor's Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld News 02/16/2011
Follow us in Twitter
And post your comments in our Facebook site
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback
and comments, share your thoughts on this article,
your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and
comments about this article, write to email@example.com
Copyright© 1999-2010 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors
Send this story to a friend Any question or suggestions,
please write to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98, ME,
XP, Vista, W7 +/ 800x600 pixels