En Español



Very usefull links



PW
Bookstore





Institutional
links


OPEC
\





 




PW
Business Partners

 


IRAQ OIL THE FORUM

 


Blogspots

FxHQ Forex News

The Global Barrel

Tiempo Cultural

Gustavo Coronel

Iran Watch.org

Le Blog des
Energies Nouvelles

News Links

AP

AFP

Aljazeera

Dow Jones

Reuters


Bloomberg

Views and News
from
Norway

 

 

 


Lagniappe

 

Paul Hodges: Oil price forecasts
based on myths, not proper analysis

Did your company or investment manager use $50/bbl as a forecast Scenario price for oil this year?
 If not, why n
ot?


Did your company or investment manager use $50/bbl as a forecast Scenario price for oil this year? If not, why not? And has this question even been asked, as you finalise forecasts for 2016?

In recent months, many readers have told me despairingly of their efforts to suggest alternative Scenarios to last year's 'consensus' view that prices would always be $100/bbl. They are even more despairing today, when they see the forecast for the next few years - which almost always suggests prices will now rise steadily.

My suggestion is that you ask your company to evaluate the success of its forecasts over the past 5 - 10 years:

  • Did it simply adopt the consensus view of $70/bbl in 2007, when budgeting for 2008?
  • Did it include a Scenario based on the potential for a major financial crisis in 2008 and a price collapse?
  • More recently, did it forecast last year's collapse from $100/bbl?
  • And did it foresee the potential for a major slowdown in China to impact the global economy?

If not, why not? And, even more importantly, what is it doing to improve the track record for the future?

The problem is that very few companies do this type of routine evaluation. Yet engineers routinely monitor whether projects are 'on time, on budget'; manufacturing teams monitor product quality and safety records; customer services monitor whether deliveries are 'on time, in full'. They know there can be no improvement without measurement.

Obviously, I do have a stake in this debate. As readers will know, I routinely post a review of the previous year's Budget Outlook before issuing the new one. I also routinely publish the full record of Budget Outlooks since 2007 , and the full record of my New Year Outlooks since 2008 .

This should be basic practice for everyone. Past performance may not ensure success in the future, but it is the best guide that we have. This discipline was certainly one reason why I was able to successfully forecast here, in the blog:
  • 2007-8's final upward rush and subsequent collapse in oil prices, as well as the potential for a major financial crisis - as highlighted in ICIS Chemical Business in November 2008
  • Plus, of course, I have argued since August 2014 that a Great Unwinding of policymaker stimulus is underway due to China's adoption of its New Normal policies, and that oil prices would collapse to $50/bbl

My point is simply that it is nonsense for others to say 'nobody could have forecast these developments'. And the world cannot progress unless we apply the basic principles of measurement to such important areas.

One particular piece of current nonsense is summarised in the above chart. This is the myth that the decline in the number of drilling rigs will have a major impact on US oil production. As we reported in last month's pH Report :

'The story has everything that is required in the era of Twitter and sound-bites: it sounds logical, is easy to grasp, and needs no follow-up.

'The only problem is that it ignores the fact that oil rig productivity, like that of gas rigs, doesn't stand still, as we discussed back in May . The number of gas rigs has fallen from 1600 in 2008 to 200 today according to Baker Hughes (BH) data , yet US Energy Information Administration's (EIA) data shows total US gas output has risen by a third from 1.8Tcf to 2.5Tcf over the period. Gas rig productivity has thus risen 11-fold , and still seems to be on an upward path. Oil rig productivity appears to be following the same pattern.

'As the chart shows (using BH oil rig count data and EIA oil output data), oil rig productivity has already risen 4-fold over the past 4 years, with no doubt more to come.

'The key is the adoption of new drilling techniques, imported from deep water operations. It would be horrendously expensive to keep drilling new wells in 1000 metres of water. Instead, companies developed the new technique of horizontal drilling which can increase production by up to 20x compared to traditional horizontal drilling. Three quarters of US rigs now drill horizontally, compared to only one quarter in 2007.'

This type of analysis is not rocket science. It only needs access to the internet and a calculator. Yet last Wednesday, a leading hedge fund told Reuters they were mystified by the rise in oil rig production:

'The part of the report that continues to amaze is the domestic production number, which showed a small rise, despite the ever-plunging rig count' .

Please, send a copy of this post to your CEO and senior management, and ask them to review its argument. It is, after all, your salary and career prospects that are affected when myths and opinion are mistaken for analysis.

 

Paul Hodges is Chairman of International eChem, trusted commercial advisers to the global chemical industry. Paul is also an invited member of the World Economic Forum's Global Agenda Council. . Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note: This commentary was originally published by icis.com on Nov. 11, 2015.Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers. Follow us in : twitter / Facebook

User notice: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated


Petroleumworld News 11/16/2015

Follow us in : twitter / Facebook


Send this story to a friend

Copyright© 1999-2009 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments,
share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

 

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

 

By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels




 

 

 

TOP

Editor & Publisher:Paul Ohep F./Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com

Contact:
editor@petroleumworld.com/ phone:


CopyRight © 1999-2010, Paul Ohep Fitzgerald.- All Rights Reserved. Legal Information


PW in Top 100 Energy Sites


Technorati Profile


CopyRight © 1999-2010, Elio Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, posted online, rewritten or redistributed by any type of means, except with permission of the author/s

The information in this web site is proprietary and is protected under United States and International Copyright and Trademark laws. No part of this web site may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means whatsoever, except with permission of the author/s..

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Any use of this site or its material, in any form, without the express prior written consent of the author, is prohibited by law and is subject to legal action. Legal Information

Top 100+

Technorati Profile
Fair use notice of copyrighted material:

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from Petroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.