Ben Casselman :
OK, so now what?
How to make sense of the Brexit turmoil
OK, so now what?
Britons shocked the world on Thursday by voting narrowly but decisively to leave the European Union. The news roiled global financial markets and sent the value of the British pound tumbling to a 30-year low . Prime Minister David Cameron has already announced he will resign after failing to convince voters to stay in the union. Right-wing politicians in France, the Netherlands and other EU member states are calling for similar votes in their countries .
Beyond that, what happens next is anyone's guess. The “Brexit,” as the British exit from the EU is widely known, is unprecedented — no country has ever left the union. The decision could push Britain into a recession , spur the breakup of both the EU and the United Kingdom and trigger a global financial meltdown to rival the 2008 crash. Or markets could settle down while the U.K. and the EU negotiate a sensible breakup agreement, and the wake-up call from British voters could push European leaders to make badly needed reforms . More likely, the outcome will fall somewhere between those two extremes.
We won't know for sure what path we're on for weeks or months. But there will be some hints along the way. Think of what follows as a guide to interpreting this turbulent period. (But for goodness sake, don't take any of it as investment advice.)
Settle in for the long haul: Bad news for anyone sick of hearing the word “Brexit”: Thursday's vote marks the beginning of the process, not the end. Assuming the U.K. leaves (more about that caveat in a second), Britain must now negotiate a new set of trade deals to replace its EU membership. That process, which could take up to two years under the treaty that serves as the EU's charter , is bound to be contentious and could cast a pall of uncertainty over Britain's economy and markets more generally. (The two-year clock doesn't start until the U.K. formally notifies the EU of its intention to leave.)
Ignore the initial market reaction: The initial reaction will tell us next to nothing about the longer-run impact a Brexit will have on markets or the broader economy . Market turmoil was probably inevitable after a decision this momentous, and it will be made worse by the fact that the outcome was a surprise: Despite polls showing a close race , most investors expected the “Remain” side to prevail in the end. That means markets hadn't fully “priced in” a Brexit and will now have to adjust.
That readjustment could be volatile — don't be surprised if markets are way down today and way up on Monday, as investors reevaluate their initial pessimism. (On the other hand, don't be surprised if markets are way down today and Monday.) Most ordinary investors are probably best off logging out of their E-Trade accounts and tossing out their 401(k) statements, at least for a couple of weeks.
But do watch markets after that: The U.K. is an important trading partner for the U.S. and a major source of investment . But even a severe recession in Britain — or even in the rest of Europe — will have only a modest impact on the U.S. economy. Much more significant, at least in the short-term, are the ripple effects that the Brexit could have on financial markets. A full-blown financial crisis is unlikely ; there is no equivalent to the U.S. housing bubble waiting to pop. But the shock of the Brexit and the uncertainty over what happens next could make investors more cautious, hurting stock prices and making banks more reluctant to lend. That, in turn, would act as a drag on the U.S. economy at a time when it is already showing signs of slowing . The U.S. Federal Reserve was worried about the possible repercussions of a Brexit when it decided not to raise interest rates earlier this month; Thursday's vote makes a rate hike in July much less likely .
And watch the dollar, too: As soon as results began to trickle in Thursday night, the value of the British pound collapsed: As of Friday morning, a pound was worth less than $1.40, down from close to $1.49 the day before. That's good news for Americans planning summer vacations in London, but it's bad news for the U.S. economy because it will make American exports more expensive in Britain. (U.S. companies sold $56 billion of goods in the U.K. last year, making it one of our top trading partners .) The bigger problem , though, will come if post-Brexit turmoil pushes up the value of the dollar against other currencies too — the dollar often serves as a safe-haven for investors during periods of volatility — which would further hurt exports to other countries.
Expect more surprises: Here is an incomplete list of things that could happen in the wake of Thursday's vote: Boris Johnson (the wild-haired former mayor of London who is often described as the U.K.'s Donald Trump) could become prime minister of Britain . The Netherlands could leave the EU . Scotland could leave the U.K. Northern Ireland could rejoin Ireland . The EU could break up entirely.
Or how about this for a plot twist: The Brexit may not happen at all. There have already been murmurs that Thursday's vote will lead the EU to offer new, more generous terms to convince Britain to stay, prompting a second referendum. An online petition calling for a re-do drew so much traffic that it crashed the U.K. government's website Friday morning. This is, to be clear, a very unlikely scenario — the referendum results were close, but not that close, and none of Britain's leaders is backing the idea of a new vote so far. But in theory, it is still possible that we could do all of this again.
Ben Casselman, Chief economics writer for @ fivethirtyeight. Adjunct @ cunyjschool. Formerly with The Wall Street Journal.
FiveThirtyEight,is a website that focuses on opinion poll analysis, politics, economics, and sports blogging. The website, which takes its name from the number of electors in the United States electoral college , was founded on March 7, 2008, as a polling aggregation website with a blog created by analyst Nate Silver . In August 2010 the blog became a licensed feature of The New York Times online. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views
This commentary was originally published by fivethirtyeight.com, on June 24, 2016. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers.
All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.
Use Notice:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by theoriginator.Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Copyright© 1999-2009 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments,
share your thoughts on this article, your feed. back is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 06/24/2016
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Follow us in : twitter / Facebook
Send this story to a friend
Write to email@example.com
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels