World

 

Brazil

Mexico

Bolivia

Peru

Trinidad &
Tobago

Venezuela







Very usefull links



 

 


Petroleumworld`s
Opinion Forum:

viewpoints on issues in energy, geopolitics and civilization

 

 

Saturday
Lagniappe

O'Reilly's Legacy Marred By Ecuador's Environmental Crisis

Amazon Watch

Toxic sludge pit left behind by ChevronTexaco

By The Amazon Defense Coalition

David O’Reilly’s surprise early retirement as CEO of Chevron comes at a time he was under increasing pressure from shareholders and the media over an environmental liability in Ecuador that could eat up roughly 20% of the market value of the company and has caused a wave of negative publicity and scrutiny from Wall Street analysts and a potential criminal investigation by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
 
“David O’Reilly’s legacy will be marred by his inability to close out the Ecuador problem which hangs over Chevron like an enormous dark cloud,” said Karen Hinton, a representative of the Amazonian communities who brought the class action suit against the company in 1993.  “His failure to deal with Ecuador has allowed all sorts of ethical troubles in Chevron to fester and grow to the point where they threaten to eat up a significant portion of the company’s market value.”
 
The Ecuador liability – stemming from what experts consider the worst oil-related contamination on the planet -- was inherited when Chevron, under O’Reilly’s watch, paid $35 billion for Texaco in 2001, apparently without accounting for a possible adverse judgment in the case, which was pending at the time in U.S. federal court.  At the time of the purchase, O’Reilly was warned by shareholders and environmental groups at Chevron’s 2001 annual meeting to vet Texaco before the purchase.
 
O’Reilly ignored the warnings about Texaco’s Ecuador liability, which at the time was estimated in the billions of dollars but the actual value of which has been determined to be $27.3 billion, according to a report prepared by a court-appointed Special Master in Ecuador.  The lawsuit asserts Texaco deliberately dumped more than 18 billion gallons of toxic waste into the Amazon when it operated 356 oil wells in Ecuador from 1964 to 1990, poisoning an ecosystem the size of Rhode Island, decimating the lifestyles of six indigenous groups and causing an epidemic of cancers and other oil-related illnesses.
 
Experts have called the disaster the “Amazon Chernobyl” and the world’s worst oil-related disaster.  Just this year, Chevron’s role in Ecuador has been covered in unflattering fashion by 60 Minutes, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times, and a host of other publications.  A judgment in the civil trial is expected in 2010; Chevron has announced it expects to lose and will seek relief in international courts.
 
“David O’Reilly is either trying get out of Chevron before the Ecuador judgment comes down and further embarrasses him, or he was hounded to retire so Chevron could try to bury an obvious corporate governance problem given its failure to properly vet Texaco,” said Chris Lehane, a lawyer and political consultant working for the Amazonian communities.
 
Earlier this year, in an open letter to shareholders, the environmental group Amazon Watch blasted O’Reilly for not properly vetting Texaco and therefore overpaying for the company.  “There is no evidence that Chevron’s management … independently vetted Texaco’s representations at the time about the nature of the lawsuit or the limitations of its [release] which no court of law in either the U.S. or Ecuador has ever accepted as valid in reference to the civil lawsuit,” said the letter, signed by Atossa Soltani, the executive director of Amazon Watch.
 
There is also no evidence that O’Reilly’s team ever independently investigated the circumstances surrounding a release Texaco secured from Ecuador’s government after a purported $40 million “remediation” that appears to have been a sham, said Andrew Woods, an American legal advisor to the plaintiffs.   Two former Texaco lawyers, Ricardo Reis Veiga and Rodrigo Perez Pallares (both now working for Chevron), are under criminal indictment in Ecuador along with seven Ecuadorian government officials for lying about the results of the remediation to secure the release.
 
Earlier this year, analysts at both Barclay’s and Oppenheimer warned Chevron’s investors about the Ecuador liability.  Oppenheimer said the $27 billion potential liability “could depress the stock until a settlement is reached” while Barclay’s called the Ecuador a “drag” on the company’s stock.  The company was also questioned by Risk Metrics, a leading investment advisory group, which asked O’Reilly to increase Chevron’s level of disclosure about the Ecuador lawsuit.  
 
Separately, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has opened a probe of the company for misleading shareholders over the Ecuador liability.  In Chevron’s SEC disclosures, the company claims the case is frivolous and that it cannot estimate a potential loss, even though the damages claim of $27.3 billion is spelled out in great detail in a 4,000-page report.
 
Cuomo’s probe is under New York’s Martin Act, which allows for both civil and criminal liability.
 
Hinton said one of O’Reilly’s critical mistakes in regard to Ecuador was hiring several “ideological lawyers” from the Bush Administration to run the company’s legal department.  These individuals, who had no experience in the oil industry, believe they must win at all costs against indigenous groups in Ecuador rather than work out a solution that would be in the best interests of the company’s shareholders.  
 
Chevron’s legal department is supervised by Charles James, a neoconservative and former assistant attorney general under John Ashcroft during the first term of George W. Bush.  Its General Counsel is R. Hewitt Pate, who also worked under James and Ashcroft at the Department of Justice and who began his tenure with Chevron in early August of this year.  O’Reilly is the only CEO of an oil major who has hired top lawyers because of their political ties rather than their experience in the industry, said Woods.

 

The Amazon Defense Coalition represents the plaintiffs in the lawsuit which include dozens of rainforest communities and five indigenous groups that inhabit Ecuador’s Northern Amazon region.  The mission of the Coalition is to protect the environment and secure social justice through grass roots organizing, political advocacy, and litigation.  Two of its leaders, Luis Yanza and Pablo Fajardo, are recipients of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize.Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.

Editor's Note: All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld. All comments expressed are private comments and do not necessary reflect the view of this website. All comments are posted and published without liability to Petroleumworld.

Fair use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

By using this link, you agree to allow PW to publish your comments on our letters page.

Petroleumworld News 10/03/09

 

Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments,
share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

By using this link, you agree to allow E&P
to publish your comments on our letters page.

 

Copyright© 2008 respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors.

Send this story to a friend

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels


TOP

Contact: editor@petroleumworld.com/phone:(58 212) 635 7252, (58 412) 996 3730 or
(58  412) 952 5301

Editor:Elio C. Ohep A/Producer - Publisher:Elio Ohep /
Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com
CopyRight © 1999-2006, Elio Ohep - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information
- CCS office Tele
phone/Teléfonos Oficina: (ß58 212) 635 7252
PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

Technorati Profile

Fair use notice of copyrighted material:
This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.