U.N.vote
becomes referendum on U.S. policy in Latin America
Bhy Catherine Elton
NYT
UNITED
NATIONS
Petroleumworld.com
07 30 06
Venezuela has set its sights on a seat on the Security Council and the
United States has set out to block it, converting a normal Council rotation
into a showdown with the country’s Washington-baiting president,
Hugo Chávez.
The
United States has had strained relations with Venezuela since Mr. Chávez
took power in 1998, and even appeared to support a coup attempt against
him in 2002. Mr. Chávez regularly rails against American foreign
policy, and has called President Bush an idiot. Making fast friends
with Washington’s adversaries, he went last week to Belarus, which
has cracked down on dissenters after an election widely believed to
be rigged. This weekend he is set to visit Iran, and he says he wants
to go to North Korea.
John
R. Bolton, the American ambassador to the United Nations, said Venezuela
would be “disruptive” as a Council member.
“I
remember when Cuba was a member of the Security Council and it was just
a disruptive influence,” he said. “We’d rather have
a responsible government on the Council.”
He
said the United States was supporting Guatemala as a reward for what
he called the recent progress it has made in becoming a peaceful, democratic
country. Mr. Bolton and other American officials have been unusually
public in expressing their support for Guatemala, and opposition to
Venezuela, and are asking other countries to follow their lead.
The
seat in question, which opens in 2007, is one of 10 on the Security
Council that rotate every two years.
With
Venezuela and Guatemala vowing to maintain their candidacies, it seems
likely that the contest will go to a vote in the General Assembly in
October, as is required when a regional bloc, in this case Latin America
and the Caribbean, fails to designate a nation. In that case, a successful
candidate needs to win two-thirds of a secret ballot by the 192 member
nations.
In
the meantime, as Latin American and Caribbean countries announce which
candidate they support, the race has become a referendum of sorts on
United States influence in the region.
“It
is further polarizing the region, moving it toward two separate blocs,”
said Adam Isaacson of the Center for International Policy in Washington.
“It has a real ‘with us or against us’ quality to
it. It’s like picking sides for kickball, with lots of wheedling
and threatening going on.”
Francisco
Arias, the Venezuelan ambassador to the United Nations, said Washington
was using “excessive force” in what he described as a senseless
campaign to quash Venezuela’s chances. He insists that Washington’s
fears are ill founded.
“We
aren’t going to be a spoiled brat, pounding on the table and breaking
lamps in the Security Council,” Mr. Arias said. Countries in the
region do not like being pressured by the United States, he said.
“Things
are changing in the region, and there are signs that relations with
the United States are going be different,” he said. “We
don’t have the kind of relations anymore where the U.S. ambassador
picks up the phone and tells the president of a country what kinds of
decisions to make.”
But
Julia E. Sweig, the director of the Latin American program at the Council
on Foreign Relations, said a vote for Guatemala was being viewed as
a vote for the United States.
“Guatemala
is a tiny country, it is a weak country, it’s very poor and it
is not known as having international stature outside of the American
purview,” she said. “It would be hard for it to operate
independently from the United States.”
NYT 29 07 06
Copyright
©2006
dpa - NYT.
All Rights Reserved.