World
 
|
US woes force BP into major review of its activities
By Odile Duperry
AFP
LONDON
Petroleumworld.com 09 26 06
Following the latest in a series of major setbacks in the United States the oil giant BP said last week it planned to embark on a major review of its global operations.
The group's US woes continued last week with the announcement of a fourth delay to its new Thunder Horse platform in the Gulf of Mexico, which is not now likely to begin operating until mid-2008.
The group said all underwater welding on the platform's structure needed to be checked.
Industry analyst Simon Wardell of Global Insight called the news "quite a big setback, a bit of a blow" that risked damaging even further BP's image in the United States.
This week also saw proceedings open in a lawsuit against the oil giant for an explosion at the Texas City oil refinery in 2005, which left 15 people dead and 170 injured.
The group has already recognised that internal errors were behind the blast and boss John Browne has publicly apologised for the explosion.
On top of that, BP was obliged to admit last week that it was responsible for a leak that saw the equivalent of 1,000 barrels of oil cause a major slick in the port of Long Beach, California.
That slick however, was minor compared to the massive spill the company caused in Alaska earlier this year.
Rusty oil pipes were to blame for that disaster, which forced the partial shut down of the Prudhoe Bay Oil field, the largest in North America.
The company is also facing three separate investigations for allegedly manipulating the prices of butane, propane and petrol between 2002 and 2004.
This week, BP announced its first piece of good news in a long time when it unveiled a planned three billion dollar (2.3 billion euro) investment in its Whiting refinery in Indiana, which will allow it to supply a million more US drivers with petrol.
But above all it began a major review of its activities, which is set to last for five to 10 years and will, BP hopes, lead to a better integration of its global activities.
Analysts say the plan is similar to an overhaul announced by BP's competitor Exxon after the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. That review saw Exxon go on to forge a reputation as the world's safest oil firm.
BP's problems in the United States are in large part linked to its extremely rapid growth. In less than six years, the firm has grown from a large British company to a global giant, following the acquisitions in 2000 and 2001 of US oil firms Arco, Castrol and Amoco.
Wardell argued this means BP has found itself with "a lot of units in isolation" within the company as a whole.
BP has publicly admitted on a number of occasions that it has made errors, notably with Browne's apologies for both the Texas City explosion and the Alaska spill.
But Wardell said it is good that BP is now showing that it intends to put its house in order.
"They are trying to take action now very swiftly to try to assure everyone that they're taking things seriously," the analyst said.
"It's not just a problem with investors, or share price, it can have some impact on reputation," he added.
After the Alaska spill BP even managed to win the support of prominent US ecologist Sybil Ackerman, who represents an association of environmentally-minded voters in the state of Oregon.
As BP has become a world leader in the field of renewable energy, Ackerman recently told Britain's Financial Times that the company was "deserving of censure, but not a vendetta."
She warned that whipping up bad feeling against the firm could in the long term do more harm than good for environmental campaigners.
"There is danger that some senators and representatives may use the Alaska problem as a club to retaliate against an oil company that has pushed hard for strong and responsible environmental measures," she said.
Ackerman argued it was important to recognise that BP had accepted it had made mistakes and tried to improve its environmental record.
"If environmentalists do not step up in support during BP's time of need, it will be a lesson to other companies that is does not pay to be green," she argued.
AFP 24 1412 GMT 09 06
Copyright ©2006 AFP. All Rights Reserved.
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE
5.01+
Windows
NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels